 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Poser?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Apache wrote:
> Poser?
I'm sure this is a Poser model. Anyway, it looks nice!
Andreas
--
http://www.render-zone.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Uh huh.
Exported to obj then converted to mesh2 with 3D Win.
The sphere is a POV-Ray primitive. :O)
"Apache" <apa### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message
news:3e1a5571$1@news.povray.org...
> Poser?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have a question. The HDRI used in this scene features a clear daytime
sky, right? The scene, however, looks to be way too blue. I know that the
atmosphere absorbs wavelengths of non-blue light and that this scene shows
the shaded side, so there should be somewhat of a blue tint. However, isn't
light from the sky hitting shadowed objects still predominantly white?
Skip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Skip Talbot" <sta### [at] uiucedu> spake thusly via
news:3e1bc272$1@news.povray.org...
> I have a question. The HDRI used in this scene features a clear daytime
> sky, right? The scene, however, looks to be way too blue. I know that the
> atmosphere absorbs wavelengths of non-blue light and that this scene shows
> the shaded side, so there should be somewhat of a blue tint. However, isn't
> light from the sky hitting shadowed objects still predominantly white?
Attached is a low res version of the HDRI image used.
I whacked the ambient factor up to 5 for the HDRI sphere in this image and that
probably boosted the glow around the sun, hence more white than there should be
and more blue too. However, I'm no HDRI expert so I'm probably talking bunkum.
Can anyone offer a more reasoned response?
Skip, I can send you the scene file if you like. With the skeleton mesh and the
image it'll be about a 1MB zip file. That OK?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'field_preview.jpg' (5 KB)
Preview of image 'field_preview.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That would be great! Thanks Alan.
Skip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Strange, I've seen that face before... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gorgeous image!
I have a different question: what setting(s) produced the shadows? I am
fairly clueless about HDRI, but have been playing with the scene from
MLPOV--even using probe images with mostly a sigle bright area
(beach_probe.hdr, for instance) I only seem to get vague blobby hints of
shadows under objects. Any help?
Thanks!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chad" <ceb### [at] druryedu> spake thusly via
news:web.3e22fc5d39bb91cb347ed4b20@news.povray.org...
> Gorgeous image!
Ta.
> I have a different question: what setting(s) produced the shadows? I am
> fairly clueless about HDRI, but have been playing with the scene from
> MLPOV--even using probe images with mostly a sigle bright area
> (beach_probe.hdr, for instance) I only seem to get vague blobby hints of
> shadows under objects. Any help?
If you can spare 1MB in your inbox, I can send you the scene file so you can see
for yourself.
If not...
The radiosity settings were ripped off from Andrew Cocker's settings as they're
pretty fast and give nice results. With a count of 1600, the render took about
30 minutes on my 1.3GHz 256MB XP box:
radiosity {
pretrace_start 0.16
pretrace_end 0.01
count 300
nearest_count 3
error_bound 0.1
recursion_limit 1
low_error_factor 1
gray_threshold 0.0
minimum_reuse 0.015
brightness 1.2
adc_bailout 0.01/2
}
The ambient setting for the HDR sphere was whacked up to 5:
sphere {
0,200
pigment {image_map {hdr "field.hdr" once interpolate 2 map_type 7}}
finish {ambient 5 diffuse 0}
hollow on
}
And all objects were given the following finish:
finish {ambient 0 diffuse 1}
Hope this helps.
Alan.
--
http://www.manhog.nildram.co.uk/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Holding wrote:
>Hope this helps.
>
I think this will be *very* helpful; thanks for offering the scene file too,
but I think just the settings will be enough. Thanks!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
