Her skin looks a bit shiney or like plastic compared with the other tetures.
good picture. I'd say it would only be offensive if her breasts are
abnormally, and untastefully huge.

Post a reply to this message

Christoph Gerber wrote:
> This could be my entry for the Frozen Moment IRTC round, however I'm
> not shure if the uncensored image would offend some people. What do
> you think?

Loose the black stripes

--

Rick

Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.426 / Virus Database: 239 - Release Date: 02/12/2002

Post a reply to this message

Looks great so far. Here's what I think cold be improved:

Give it some foreground. Maybe a patch of water plants would do it.

The girl is currently on a -y move so her hair should be flowing in
the opposite direction.

Give the first two rocks slight outward ripples, and keep in mind the
timing :) If you observe the speed ripples spread in water in real
life, then by giving them the appropriate spread in you picture you'll
give a more focused idea of time.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

The landscape elements, especially the trees are very convincing.  The 
nude girl is not offensive but a bit unpredictable.  Remember, the nude, 
is a very loaded image.  You can't control what associations the viewer 
might have through it. It strikes me as a bit gratuitous in this image.

Post a reply to this message

"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] aolcom> wrote in message news:3df25283$1@news.povray.org...
: The landscape elements, especially the trees are very convincing.  The
: nude girl is not offensive but a bit unpredictable.  Remember, the nude,
: is a very loaded image.  You can't control what associations the viewer
: might have through it. It strikes me as a bit gratuitous in this image.

Maybe if you add a naked man running after her?
Just a thought...
=Bob=

Post a reply to this message

Thanks everybody for your comments and suggestions. Considering the risk of
triggering e-mail wars about nudity I think it's better not submit this to
the IRTC. Anyway, for those interested I attached a reworked version in
which I tried to implement some of the suggestions made. I reworked the cat
tails and stone textures, added some faint clouds to ths sky and some
ripples to the water around the stones.
Regards, Christoph

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'Jump.jpg' (118 KB)

Preview of image 'Jump.jpg'

Sorry, I would like the image much more withiout the girl.
The image has a lot of fine details, (I like the ripples around
the stones), but Posette looks like plastic (and I do not care
about nudity in images, if someone has a problem with it,
well it's the problem of that someone).

-Ive

Post a reply to this message

Nice ripples, but why does the leftmost stone also have them? Or are
they not from her stepping on the stones but for some other reason?

If you could dress her, even in something very ephemeral, you could 1)
indicate motion much better and 2) post it to the IRTC without
worrying too much


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

Christoph Gerber wrote:
> 
> Thanks everybody for your comments and suggestions. Considering the risk of
> triggering e-mail wars about nudity I think it's better not submit this to
> the IRTC. Anyway, for those interested I attached a reworked version in
> which I tried to implement some of the suggestions made. I reworked the cat
> tails and stone textures, added some faint clouds to ths sky and some
> ripples to the water around the stones.

The scenery looks very nice, but like others i have some problems with the
figure.  It indeed looks quite plastic, like a doll somehow.  Dressing her
might help.

The trees in the far background look very good, the branches of the nearer
ones appear a bit strange, probably too massive.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 07 Dec. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message

Unfortunately it's too late to change the figure. Tomorrow is my last day in
this cold and dark place for 2 weeks and my wife certainly would not allow
me to bring a laptop to La Gomera, even if I had one  ...

Best regards, Christoph

"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3DF46E16.4451003B@gmx.de...
>
>
> Christoph Gerber wrote:
> >
> > Thanks everybody for your comments and suggestions. Considering the risk
of
> > triggering e-mail wars about nudity I think it's better not submit this
to
> > the IRTC. Anyway, for those interested I attached a reworked version in
> > which I tried to implement some of the suggestions made. I reworked the
cat
> > tails and stone textures, added some faint clouds to ths sky and some
> > ripples to the water around the stones.
>
> The scenery looks very nice, but like others i have some problems with the
> figure.  It indeed looks quite plastic, like a doll somehow.  Dressing her
> might help.
>
> The trees in the far background look very good, the branches of the nearer
> ones appear a bit strange, probably too massive.
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
> HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
> Last updated 07 Dec. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message