 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, I got the idea from illusionworks.com and I just had to try it.
What do you think? Is it more confusing that it's 4x4 and 3x3 at the
same time or that it eternally de/ascends? Is it worth developing into
a scene?
My other question is this. Is there any way to 'fake' perspective? Can
you map a texture so that it decreases in size with distance? I can't
take much more of this orthographic stuff...
- Rico
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'staircase.jpg' (63 KB)
Preview of image 'staircase.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
HOW DO YOU PEOPLE DO THESE COOL THINGS!!!! ARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!
-ok, I am better now....
wow, that is so cool!
nice job.
paul
Reusser wrote:
> Well, I got the idea from illusionworks.com and I just had to try it.
> What do you think? Is it more confusing that it's 4x4 and 3x3 at the
> same time or that it eternally de/ascends? Is it worth developing into
> a scene?
>
> My other question is this. Is there any way to 'fake' perspective? Can
> you map a texture so that it decreases in size with distance? I can't
> take much more of this orthographic stuff...
>
> - Rico
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paul wrote:
> HOW DO YOU PEOPLE DO THESE COOL THINGS!!!! ARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!
Thanks. Seriously, take a look at illusionworks.com. Under "impossible
staircase", it has a couple drawings and a great sketch showing how it's done.
It's actually quite simple.
- Rico
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Reusser wrote:
>
> Well, I got the idea from illusionworks.com and I just had to try it.
> What do you think? Is it more confusing that it's 4x4 and 3x3 at the
> same time or that it eternally de/ascends? Is it worth developing into
> a scene?
IMO it looks good as it is, but adding some more absurdities could be
interesting of course.
I must admit i don't know how it works, could you post the geometry?
>
> My other question is this. Is there any way to 'fake' perspective? Can
> you map a texture so that it decreases in size with distance? I can't
> take much more of this orthographic stuff...
>
You can use a gradient pattern with a texture map and a lot of differently
scaled textures. Another possibility would ba a megapov displace warp.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Please don't post images like this on a Friday. It's been a hard week.
Any chance of an animated rotating version? (w/o radiosity unless you're feeling
maschocistic).
BTW Bravo.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I remember seeing more complex version of this made in pov.
There is also audio version of the impossible staircase:
http://www.pp.htv.fi/kkivisal/down.mp3
_____________
Kari Kivisalo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kari Kivisalo wrote:
> There is also audio version of the impossible staircase:
> http://www.pp.htv.fi/kkivisal/down.mp3
Cool. The illusionworks website talked about this but it was in some
format that I didn't have the plugin for. It said that the pitch is
played in multiple octaves at the same time. The intensity of the pitch
in each octave is fit to a bell curve so each tone fades in, then out.
Thanks!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Reusser wrote:
>
> It said that the pitch is
> played in multiple octaves at the same time. The intensity of the pitch
> in each octave is fit to a bell curve so each tone fades in, then out.
I made the sample with AudioMulch Risset Tone Generator. It also has
Risset Filter which has a filter bank instead of oscillator bank.
http://www.audiomulch.com
_____________
Kari Kivisalo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> Any chance of an animated rotating version? (w/o radiosity unless you're feeling
> maschocistic).
>
> BTW Bravo.
Thanks. It's on p.b.a. (with faked radiosity in the beginning ;) ).
Maschocistic? Websters is as puzzled as I am.
- Rico
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3B3C901F.4943BEF6@chorus.net>, Reusser says...
> Well, I got the idea from illusionworks.com and I just had to try it.
> What do you think? Is it more confusing that it's 4x4 and 3x3 at the
> same time or that it eternally de/ascends? Is it worth developing into
> a scene?
>
> My other question is this. Is there any way to 'fake' perspective? Can
> you map a texture so that it decreases in size with distance? I can't
> take much more of this orthographic stuff...
>
> - Rico
>
> [image/jpeg,Unknown Document]
>
Really very shocking! I must have seen somewhere someplace how it works:
some kind of overlapping partial images ?
Do you know M.C. Escher's graphical work? Famous 'Waterfall' perpetuum
mobile type? Now if you could animate THAT, that would really be
astounding :-)
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
