 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's right! 246K - high-detail.
http://www.pietyhillcottages.com/Images/water04.jpg
Something has been pointed out to me - the girl looks like she doesn't
have anything on over the waist. She does, and I've taken steps to make
it more apparent (and wetsuit-like) in the final.
Enjoy!
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mick Hazelgrove
Subject: Re: The Big picture you've all been waiting for:
Date: 19 Apr 2001 12:56:04
Message: <3adf18a4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm curious about the girl is she a model of your own or a Poser model or?
Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Geoff Wedig
Subject: Re: The Big picture you've all been waiting for:
Date: 19 Apr 2001 13:32:29
Message: <3adf212c@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
H.E. Day <The### [at] heday freeserverscom> wrote:
> That's right! 246K - high-detail.
> http://www.pietyhillcottages.com/Images/water04.jpg
> Something has been pointed out to me - the girl looks like she doesn't
> have anything on over the waist. She does, and I've taken steps to make
> it more apparent (and wetsuit-like) in the final.
> Enjoy!
I'm curious about the girl too. How was the hair done? It looks
unantialiased, though everything else is. Her face looks a little funny,
and the proportions seem off on body size, somehow.
The blimp on the lower edge makes my eye want to move down into the pit, and
it can't, because that's the direction of motion. Ideally, you should
position it such that the direction of motion pulls back into the scene.
(and yeah, I know that the blimp is moving into the scene, but it's balanced
enough in shape that my eye wants to backtrack)
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: The Big picture you've all been waiting for:
Date: 19 Apr 2001 15:58:54
Message: <3ADF437C.F5759425@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H.E. Day" wrote:
>
> That's right! 246K - high-detail.
> http://www.pietyhillcottages.com/Images/water04.jpg
> Something has been pointed out to me - the girl looks like she doesn't
> have anything on over the waist. She does, and I've taken steps to make
> it more apparent (and wetsuit-like) in the final.
> Enjoy!
>
Nice, the details are much better visible than in the posted versions.
But to be honest, i don't like the girl.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'm curious about the girl is she a model of your own or a Poser model or?
Mine, from scratch.
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'm curious about the girl too. How was the hair done? It looks
> unantialiased, though everything else is. Her face looks a little funny,
> and the proportions seem off on body size, somehow.
Blob and turbulated planar function.
> The blimp on the lower edge makes my eye want to move down into the pit, and
> it can't, because that's the direction of motion. Ideally, you should
> position it such that the direction of motion pulls back into the scene.
> (and yeah, I know that the blimp is moving into the scene, but it's balanced
> enough in shape that my eye wants to backtrack)
Perhaps I should move it upwards a bit?
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Nice, the details are much better visible than in the posted versions.
> But to be honest, i don't like the girl.
Perhaps you could tell me *why* it bothers you, so I could take some steps to
fix it. :-)
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: The Big picture you've all been waiting for:
Date: 19 Apr 2001 23:07:15
Message: <3adfa7e3@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If it were the one -I- was waiting for, it would be 4:3 so that I don't
have to mess it up to fit my desktop...
Like the girl, and agree that the lowest blimp pulls the eye away. If it
were hind end towards us and pointing at a landing bay that might work.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: The Big picture you've all been waiting for:
Date: 20 Apr 2001 00:53:53
Message: <3ADFC0E5.1041B50B@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H.E. Day" wrote:
>
> Perhaps you could tell me *why* it bothers you, so I could take some steps to
> fix it. :-)
>
Well i though about that, but i don't really know, the strong contrast is
somehow irritating, her back side should be more bluish.
Maybe also try putting her on some kind of scooter.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Geoff Wedig
Subject: Re: The Big picture you've all been waiting for:
Date: 20 Apr 2001 07:29:59
Message: <3ae01db7@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill DeWitt <bde### [at] cflrrcom> wrote:
> If it were the one -I- was waiting for, it would be 4:3 so that I don't
> have to mess it up to fit my desktop...
> Like the girl, and agree that the lowest blimp pulls the eye away. If it
> were hind end towards us and pointing at a landing bay that might work.
And moving it up slightly, so that it's almost completely visible within the
frame. Having it break the frame boundary creates movement, which is good,
but the movement has to be in the proper direction. ;)
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
