|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Bill DeWitt <bde### [at] cfl rr com> wrote:
> If it were the one -I- was waiting for, it would be 4:3 so that I don't
> have to mess it up to fit my desktop...
> Like the girl, and agree that the lowest blimp pulls the eye away. If it
> were hind end towards us and pointing at a landing bay that might work.
And moving it up slightly, so that it's almost completely visible within the
frame. Having it break the frame boundary creates movement, which is good,
but the movement has to be in the proper direction. ;)
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |