Gail Shaw wrote:
> For those who live far enough north to see the real thing, does
> it look right?

I personally live in city area, where those can't be seen, and a bit too
south, but I found some nice finnish photos about northern lights:
<http://www.sci.fi/~fmbb/astro/revontulet.htm#kuvat>. Page itself is in
finnish, but I think the pics itself talk some language you understand.
Almost all links in that section point to picture pages.

You have taken a challenging but wonderful task, I wish you luck.

-- 
          /"\                           |    iki.
          \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign |    fi/
           X      Against HTML Mail     |    zds
          / \

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'aur32435.jpg' (11 KB) Download 'aur32432.jpg' (12 KB) Download 'aur29934.jpg' (15 KB)

Preview of image 'aur32435.jpg'

Preview of image 'aur32432.jpg'

Preview of image 'aur29934.jpg'

"Gail Shaw" <gsh### [at] monotixcoza> wrote in message
news:3ac0a200@news.povray.org...
> Now using multiple sine waves with different frequencies,
> amplitudes and phase. (Thanks Christoph)
>
> The color is also varied slightly.
>
D'oh! I've been blind. You just gave me what I was looking for. A sine wae
isosurface would make a great corrogated iron roofing sheet.
The Aurora looks cool, too

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:52:13 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:

>Comments? suggestions?

I love Aurora, but have only ever seen it on TV or in 
photos.  The stars had quite an impact, I put my hand
up and rubbed the screen thinking it was dusty:-)

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

 10:45pm  up 53 days, 23:28,  2 users,  load average: 1.12, 1.18, 1.09

Post a reply to this message

Gail Shaw wrote:
> 
> I decided I needed some atmospheric effects for my
> irtc entry (which I will post once it's more than a few cylinders
> and cones)
> 
> This is supposed to be the aurora borealis.  It's an isosurface
> containing media with a function used in the density.
> 
> For those who live far enough north to see the real thing, does
> it look right?

Here's a Norwegian "Northern-light picture of the month" page:

http://www.northern-lights.no/zope//Contest/Gallery/

The above link takes you to the photos of the current month, but 
you can choose to view a lot of photos from prior months as well.

You'll probably notice that northern-lights comes in a great 
variety of "shapes" and colours.


-- 
Best regards,

Tor Olav

mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://hjem.sol.no/t-o-k/tokpicts.html
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok

Post a reply to this message

>

Impressive.  Knowing what you're attempting, the effect is impressively
close.  But I wonder if, in a scene, I would interpret it correctly.  From
the photos others have posted, your result looks perfectly plausible, but too
regular perhaps to fit our idea of how the borealis looks.  My memories of my
personal experience of them is the spooky speed and the awesome scale.  It's
as if they make you realize how big the sky really is.

Post a reply to this message

In article <3ac07177@news.povray.org>, "Gail Shaw" 
<gsh### [at] monotixcoza> wrote:

> For the iso experts, is there any way I can randomly vary the
> distance between the peaks of a sine wave?

It might be better to just drop the sine wave, and use a 1D or 2D noise 
pattern. Like noise3d(x, 1, 1), noise3d(x, 1, z*3), or something.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message

Hello.  This is your friendly neighborhood Canadian here...
    We see the northern lights all the time at home.  First of all, what are
you wanting to use the northern light effect for?  If you are going for
visual impact, it is alright to use the photos that have been linked to as
examples, but the extreme colors and brightness is not typical (at least
where I live) so you may want to tone it down and make it just a little bit
whiter and more transparent (although the coloring in the second image you
posted is a lot better).
    I think the biggest problem with your image is the straight line on the
bottom.  It should really be more of a flowing line (always reminded me of a
brush stroke with watercolors bleeding up into the sky).  The other thing
that needs a bit of work is the bands of color that are very close together.
They don't really flow into each other the way they should, but if you
scaled the whole aurora borealis in the x direction by about 2, the effect
would be a lot more graceful.  The other thing that I was going to mention
is that if you are looking for more pictures of this effect, you may note
that they have similar effects in the southern hemisphere (aurora
australialis, I believe) that may have links and photos on the internet.
Great job though.  I still don't understand isosurfaces and media very well,
but it looks like quite the difficult project you've started.  Good luck.

Stephen Bell
http://students.oc.edu/stephen.bell


"Gail Shaw" <gsh### [at] monotixcoza> wrote in message
news:3ac0a200@news.povray.org...
> Now using multiple sine waves with different frequencies,
> amplitudes and phase. (Thanks Christoph)
>
> The color is also varied slightly.
>
> Gail
> *************************************************************************
> * gsh### [at] monotixcoza                *   Step into the abyss,           *
> * http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/   *   and let go.        Babylon 5   *
> *************************************************************************
> * The difficult we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer *
> *************************************************************************
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Look at http://www.spaceweather.com/aurora/gallery_20mar01.html

--
Mark

Post a reply to this message

Geoff Wedig <wed### [at] darwinepbicwruedu> wrote in message
news:3ac0d7b3@news.povray.org...
>
> Reminds me of the opening credits to Superman: The Movie. ;)

Is that good? (Never seen the movie)

> It looks too straight to me.  The pictures I've seen are more like swirls
of
> lit up mist with tendrils all throughout.  This looks more like a paint
line
> streaked upwards.

See below for the picture I'm using as a model

Gail
*************************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza                *   Step into the abyss,           *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/   *   and let go.        Babylon 5   *
*************************************************************************
* The difficult we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer *
*************************************************************************

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'AuroraModel.jpg' (7 KB)

Preview of image 'AuroraModel.jpg'

And version 3. It's amazing what a little
turbulence does.


I'm also working on a red and yellow aurora, but it doesn't
look so good.

Comments?

Gail
*************************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza                *   Step into the abyss,           *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/   *   and let go.        Babylon 5   *
*************************************************************************
* The difficult we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer *
*************************************************************************

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'aurora.jpg' (8 KB) Download 'aurora2.jpg' (13 KB)

Preview of image 'aurora.jpg'

Preview of image 'aurora2.jpg'