 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
>>That translates into more than a year for a final quality hires image,
>>and that is a bit too long for me.
>>
>
> More than a year!?! Are you sure? Aside from the amazing complexity your
> image does not seem to have any of the usual render time eaters like ISOs,
> lots of glass, or photons. I would have been surprised had you said a month.
> What resolution are you rendering these at, and what is the speed of your
> computer?
The hires images I render are 2700x2025 (that's suitable for my Epson
1520 printer), and I use an Athlon 1333MHz. The interior overview image
of took 4 days and 14 hours at that res, so if the factor 100 is
correct... well, you do the math, as they say :-)
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The hires images I render are 2700x2025 (that's suitable for my Epson
> 1520 printer), and I use an Athlon 1333MHz. The interior overview image
> of took 4 days and 14 hours at that res, so if the factor 100 is
> correct... well, you do the math, as they say :-)
Hmm wow 4 days with no special settings, that MUST be a complex model! How
the heck do you prevent yourself from going crazy after working on the same
model for a year? I start to get anxious after working on an image for a few
weeks. I admire your patience, it really pays off as that is a spectacular
model you have! Well I guess if the slow down is really by a factor of 100
then your right, though I bet you'd find that it's not quite that bad, not
that 6-7 months is any better though:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
> How the heck do you prevent yourself from going crazy after working on the same
> model for a year?
Well, you don't. But if you are insane enough in the first place, to
start on a project of that size, nobody notices the difference =8-}
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ib Rasmussen wrote:
>
> While you're there, check out my new site map at
> http://home4.inet.tele.dk/ibras/sitemap.htm
> (It may not be quite the kind of site map you expect.)
Impressive work as always. Makes me want to do something as impressive,
but I'm not sure that I have persistence or skills for it...
P.S. In sitemap citadel link doesn't work.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Vahur Krouverk wrote:
> Impressive work as always.
Thank you.
> P.S. In sitemap citadel link doesn't work.
I thought I had tested them all, but obviously I hadn't.
It should work now.
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
