|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thomas Lake wrote:
>>That translates into more than a year for a final quality hires image,
>>and that is a bit too long for me.
>>
>
> More than a year!?! Are you sure? Aside from the amazing complexity your
> image does not seem to have any of the usual render time eaters like ISOs,
> lots of glass, or photons. I would have been surprised had you said a month.
> What resolution are you rendering these at, and what is the speed of your
> computer?
The hires images I render are 2700x2025 (that's suitable for my Epson
1520 printer), and I use an Athlon 1333MHz. The interior overview image
of took 4 days and 14 hours at that res, so if the factor 100 is
correct... well, you do the math, as they say :-)
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |