 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Reusser wrote in message <3B3### [at] chorus net>...
>
>Thanks. It's on p.b.a. (with faked radiosity in the beginning ;) ).
Ah!! Much appreciated. Sweet.
BTW any chance of posting either the code or putting a larger version on the
web - I've a hankering for a new desktop...
>
>Maschocistic? Websters is as puzzled as I am.
>
Should have been masochistic:
1 a form of (esp. sexual) perversion characterized by gratification derived
from one's own pain or humiliation (cf. SADISM).
2 colloq. the enjoyment of what appears to be painful or tiresome.
and I was thinking of the second sense...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> >Maschocistic? Websters is as puzzled as I am.
> >
>
> Should have been masochistic:
>
> 1 a form of (esp. sexual) perversion characterized by gratification derived
> from one's own pain or humiliation (cf. SADISM).
> 2 colloq. the enjoyment of what appears to be painful or tiresome.
>
> and I was thinking of the second sense...
I prefer - schadenfreude \SHAH-dun-froy-duh\
: enjoyment obtained from the troubles of others
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kari Kivisalo wrote:
>
> I remember seeing more complex version of this made in pov.
I think it was an IRTC entry by Sonya Roberts (BIG Maybe).
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Aha, I found it. It still baffles me after staring at this picture for a few
minutes how he managed to put it in perspective. Oh well, I guess that's the
advantage of two dimensional drawings versus three dimensional scenes.
http://www.worldofescher.com/gallery/AscendingDescendingLg.html
- Rico
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:28:45 +0100, Tom Melly wrote:
Don't thing that regex is going to work:-)
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:03am up 148 days, 2:54, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.10, 1.23
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Beautiful image.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:06am up 148 days, 2:58, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.05, 1.17
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Really very shocking! I must have seen somewhere someplace how it works:
>some kind of overlapping partial images ?
>
>Do you know M.C. Escher's graphical work? Famous 'Waterfall' perpetuum
>mobile type? Now if you could animate THAT, that would really be
>astounding :-)
It has been animated...IRTC animation entry for April-July called "That's
Impossible"..
Oldstench................
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Reusser <reu### [at] chorusnet> wrote:
>Well, I got the idea from illusionworks.com and I just had to try it.
>What do you think? Is it more confusing that it's 4x4 and 3x3 at the
>same time or that it eternally de/ascends? Is it worth developing into
>a scene?
>
>My other question is this. Is there any way to 'fake' perspective? Can
>you map a texture so that it decreases in size with distance? I can't
>take much more of this orthographic stuff...
>
> - Rico
Great picture...any possibilty of posting the scene file? I am really
interested in your lighting and radiosity.
Oldstench................
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <lharjt4itm4gpnhu45a7ch4go67dtej8il@4ax.com>, Oldstench
says...
> >Do you know M.C. Escher's graphical work? Famous 'Waterfall' perpetuum
> >mobile type? Now if you could animate THAT, that would really be
> >astounding :-)
>
> It has been animated...IRTC animation entry for April-July called "That's
> Impossible"..
>
> Oldstench................
>
This one: http://www.worldofescher.com/gallery/WaterfallLg.html ?
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oldstench wrote:
> Great picture...any possibilty of posting the scene file? I am really
> interested in your lighting and radiosity.
> Oldstench................
Well, okay. I cleaned up the code quite a bit. Now there's a variable so
you can change the height of each step and have the camera angle calculated
automatically, but I didn't do too much about optimizing the features. To
me, as long as it is finished by morning, it doesn't make too much of a
difference whether it takes four hours or eight. Also, the lighting just
consists of a yellow/orange area light with high intensity, and a blue sky
sphere for radiosity. That's about the extent of what you'll find in the
file, but I'll post it in p.b.s-f.
- Rico
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
