 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You're awesome, man.
Setep
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H.E. Day" wrote:
> Comments?
Only that I'm in awe of what people with more imagination and patience can do.
--
Anton Sherwood -- br0### [at] p0b0x com -- http://ogre.nu/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Excuse me Mr. Yad...but I believe you are making a mistake. Perhaps I'm the
only one, but I feel the docks have promise. They not only give a sense of
scale but they add an element of intrigue and contrast to the station...
With a solitary "ground" reference I notice and appreciate more the fact
that the station is floating. Sure, they're incomplete...but I dare imagine
what you could do with them between now and the competition deadline...
I think you're on to something...don't throw it away...
-Chris-
H.E. Day <The### [at] hedayfreeserverscom> wrote in message
news:3AB2C65E.F844CB35@heday.freeservers.com...
> The dock is history. :) So are the extension thingies. I'll post more
> tomorrow. Hopefully.... :)
>
> Ewioh Yad
> <><
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3AB23EAE.60C476FB@heday.freeservers.com>, "H.E. Day"
<The### [at] hedayfreeserverscom> wrote:
> Well, I don't know if I like the docks. I guess they're gonna need a
> lot more detail 'for I'm happy.
> The ever-annoying "grey line" is gone. Lots of little modifications
> too.
> Comments?
Wow.
Wow.
Um, wow.
I think the waterfall looks pretty good, like a huge, shallow lake
emptying into...something. Maybe it empties into a deep channel leading
to the ocean...I like the way you leave it for the viewer to figure out
where the water is going. Perhaps some land in the distance would work...
I think the dock is a good idea, but the glow beneath the "floats" needs
work...maybe if it was more of a tube shape instead of a cylinder or the
shape it is now. The sharp points at the sides just look wrong somehow.
The sky looks good. Not realistic, but very good...I wouldn't change
them.
Maybe put those cables at the bottom on some kind of arm that connects
to the fortress...like it's replenishing it's power and taking on
supplies for another patrol. Maybe a second fortress hovering in the
distance, floating off to take the place of the one being resupplied.
Something under that big slab to the left would look nice...a well
defended supply station.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2001-03-16 18:02, Margus Ramst <mar### [at] peakeduee> wrote:
>"H.E. Day" wrote:
>>
>> Comments?
>
>Ah! Looking at this one I finally recognized the waterfall that
>everyone was talking about :P
>Before I just couldn't figure it out for some reason, although looking
>back now I can clearly see it in the previous versions too. Weird.
I had the same problem at first, especially in the first version: I
thought that the "ocean" was land and that the "waterfall" was the sea
with a rather weird wave pattern on it. But then it suddenly clicked
into place and I could view it both ways.
This version is much clearer. The "dock" really helps to see the water
as water. Unlike most of the others I like it and I also like the
bridges.
I would put something on the dock to show that it is in use -
warehouses, vehicles, etc.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | All Linux applications run on Solaris,
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | which is our implementation of Linux.
| | | hjp### [at] wsracat |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Scott McNealy, Dec. 2000
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
