 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Now that does look good, but and you know there's always a but,
I can see the sky through the middle windows at the front just
above the door, (well I think it's the sky), that doesn't look
right some how. And also the image seems to have gained a
flattness from something that's been changed, maybe you've
added ambient lighting.
My first thought was Coldits. Keep up the good work, this is
really coming along.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:02am up 11:29, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.01, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steve <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> schreef in berichtnieuws
slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
> Now that does look good, but and you know there's always a but,
Hey! That's my line!!!
:-)
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice! Threatening!
But... (Always a but...)
It looks so flat! it really needs some contrast... I really think some
torches would look nice. And drop the ambient. And, maybe, try radiosity.
Will look even better!
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Marc-Hendrik Bremer <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> schreef in
berichtnieuws 39e4272e@news.povray.org...
> Hi,
>
> here is the current state of my work on the fortress. As you can see, I
> changed quite a lot. What I'm not satisfied with in this image is, that
the
> flags indicate lots of wind, while there is no snow-flurry and -drift. But
> since my media refuses to work as I would like it to, I left it the way it
> is.
>
> What do you say?
>
> Marc-Hendrik
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc-Hendrik Bremer <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:39e4272e@news.povray.org...
> Hi,
>
> here is the current state of my work on the fortress. As you can see, I
> changed quite a lot. What I'm not satisfied with in this image is, that
the
> flags indicate lots of wind, while there is no snow-flurry and -drift. But
> since my media refuses to work as I would like it to, I left it the way it
> is.
>
> What do you say?
Nice.
How about some archers in the towers (Or cannons) and some torches on the
wall.
Gail
********************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza * System.dat not found. *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Reformat hard drive Y)es O)k *
********************************************************************
* If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0 *
********************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Run Away! Run Away! Run Away!
haha, you silly english type persons.
Much improved, nice work. Walls need a little more contrast though.
--
Dan D.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, it's the sky or more precise the "sunlit" edge of one of the clouds.
The back of the upper part is made only out of some woodbeams, as I read
that was the way they did it in medieval times for the supply of arrows and
things like that. I'll think about it.
The flatness is due to the radiosity I used (ambient_light is 0). The clouds
block almost every direct light from the "sun", but with all that white snow
... In fact, the light_source is only responsible for the white edges of the
clouds. I'll probably have to change them for more direct lighting.
BTW: There is indeed always a "but" perhaps we could add an abbreviation
lithe TIAAB? :-) This one is far from finished.
Marc-Hendrik
Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>Now that does look good, but and you know there's always a but,
>I can see the sky through the middle windows at the front just
>above the door, (well I think it's the sky), that doesn't look
>right some how. And also the image seems to have gained a
>flattness from something that's been changed, maybe you've
>added ambient lighting.
>
>My first thought was Coldits. Keep up the good work, this is
>really coming along.
>
>--
>Cheers
>Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
>
>%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
>
>web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
>
>or http://start.at/zero-pps
>
> 10:02am up 11:29, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.01, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
The clouds are layered planes from Samuel Benge, only a little bit modified.
Marc-Hendrik
Ian Witham schrieb in Nachricht <39e43f61@news.povray.org>...
>
>"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
>news:39e4272e@news.povray.org...
>
>> What do you say?
>
>YES!!!!!! now it looks BIG... imposing, and not friendly.... just the way
>you wanted it...
>The sky is looking very nice also.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
Hi hi, no ambient used - but radiosity. The fault is probably that the
direct lighting is blocked by the clouds and the snow add to much to the
overall radiosity-lighting. I'll try to change that. Perhaps torches or
something like that would be good to bring back some of the shadows and add
some colors.
Marc-Hendrik
Zeger Knaepen schrieb in Nachricht <39e45a69$1@news.povray.org>...
>Nice! Threatening!
>But... (Always a but...)
>It looks so flat! it really needs some contrast... I really think some
>torches would look nice. And drop the ambient. And, maybe, try radiosity.
>Will look even better!
>
>ZK
>http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
Torches will probably come in the near future. Not to sure about archers ...
I would like to add them, but I'm struggling with the winter-clothes, they
would need in this snow. Since I'm working most of the time with the Blobman
that's not that an easy task.
Marc-Hendrik
Gail Shaw schrieb in Nachricht <39e45ffa@news.povray.org>...
>
>Nice.
>
>How about some archers in the towers (Or cannons) and some torches on the
>wall.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: Torganswall again (jpeg 69 kb)
Date: 11 Oct 2000 16:00:55
Message: <39e4c6f7@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ddombrow schrieb in Nachricht <39e4749e$1@news.povray.org>...
>Run Away! Run Away! Run Away!
>
>haha, you silly english type persons.
>
Hm, I don't get this one. I don't think I'm an english type person ....well,
I try to type in English, but ... ? :-)
>Much improved, nice work. Walls need a little more contrast though.
Thanks and yes, you are right, definite need of some shadows!
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
