 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shit!!!
I don't wanted to post this twice! Unfortunately I can't cancel my posts on
this server. Don't know why, OE 4.72 does not let me. No problems with it on
the Newsserver of my ISP ... If someone else can cancel it, please do so.
Sorry,
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
Maybe darken the fort a bit, lessen the contrast between the
stone and mortar, make both the stone and mortar darker.
The flags have a happy fapping in the wind on a sunny day
feel to them, make the sky cloudy.
First impressions of the snow are good, but I didn't concentrate
on it too much, it'll probably lose some of it's brightness when
you put the dark grey clouds in.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:55pm up 34 days, 19:09, 2 users, load average: 2.33, 2.19, 1.92
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Steve" <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
> You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>
Of course, the problem here might be that it's his city - I can hear the
architects bitching about it - "He wants imposing and friendly? - what he
wants is a good kick up the a***"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:33:49 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>I don't wanted to post this twice! Unfortunately I can't cancel my posts on
>this server. Don't know why, OE 4.72 does not let me. No problems with it on
>the Newsserver of my ISP ... If someone else can cancel it, please do so.
Done.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Proudly not helping RIAA and SDMI steal my rights --
http://www.eff.org/Misc/EFF/Newsletters/EFFector/HTML/effect13.08.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
MHB
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>
Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
probably more imposing, isn't it?
>Maybe darken the fort a bit, lessen the contrast between the
>stone and mortar, make both the stone and mortar darker.
I'll work on this.
>
>The flags have a happy fapping in the wind on a sunny day
>feel to them, make the sky cloudy.
Ok.
>
>First impressions of the snow are good, but I didn't concentrate
>on it too much, it'll probably lose some of it's brightness when
>you put the dark grey clouds in.
>
It's just a quick HF to have a ground. Perhaps I'll come up with some rocks
and precipices, 'cause Torganswall is located on mountains with glaciers,
everlasting ice etc.
Thanks,
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly schrieb in Nachricht <39cf6681@news.povray.org>...
>"Steve" <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> wrote in message
>news:slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
>> You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>>
>
>Of course, the problem here might be that it's his city - I can hear the
>architects bitching about it - "He wants imposing and friendly? - what he
>wants is a good kick up the a***"
>
That might in fact be the problem :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:39cfcae0@news.povray.org...
>
> Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
> >You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
> >
>
> Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
> probably more imposing, isn't it?
I think you misunderstand the sentence:
Imposing = No
Cute = Yes
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ian Witham schrieb in Nachricht <39d00cd6@news.povray.org>...
>"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
>news:39cfcae0@news.povray.org...
>>
>> Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>> >You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>> >
>>
>> Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
>> probably more imposing, isn't it?
>
>I think you misunderstand the sentence:
>
>Imposing = No
>Cute = Yes
>
No I understood it that way. But I wonder if it is possible to look imposing
AND cute at the same time. I hope 'imposing' has no connotation which I
totally miss, because most of the suggestions for this pic seems to say:
"make it darker, and add thinks to scare people of". I agree this will
probably help making it imposing, but I thought of a more "friendly" way. As
Tom Melly said in his reply: That might well be the problem. :-)
Greetings,
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:57:11 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
>Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>>You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>>
>
>Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
>probably more imposing, isn't it?
"Doesn't" is an abbreviation of "does not",
If I'd have said "It does not look imposing", it would sound asthough I
was disagreeing with you, but by saying "it doesn't look imposing", the
meaning is softened considerably and made much less formal. The
interpretation relies a lot on the context so don't (do not), take any
of the above to be a hard and fast rool.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:36pm up 35 days, 18:50, 2 users, load average: 2.11, 2.09, 2.05
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
