 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Spock" <spo### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
news:39a54873$1@news.povray.org...
> You might want to move from stereo to 5.1 surround
> sound,
:-) I was waiting for someone to say that, lets just say theres 2 speakers
behind you and one behind the screen that you can't see.
> and perhaps provide seating for two (might be
> a big chair for two to curl up in...)
If guests arrive I can produce extra seating at the push of a button.. well
a few buttons anyway (object {sofa})
> My personal taste would run to more futuristic looking
> speakers. Perhaps spheres suspended from the ceiling
> instead of the big-box look. And the blue cloth is not
> what I would choose.
>
> Hey, you asked for comments :-) Nice work!
Thanks!
--
Ian
Inkwell: Ian's Homepage
http://www.topcities.com/cartoon/inkwell/index.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
if it's a plasma display, there can't be a speaker behind it.
Ian Witham wrote:
>
> "Spock" <spo### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
> news:39a54873$1@news.povray.org...
> > You might want to move from stereo to 5.1 surround
> > sound,
>
> :-) I was waiting for someone to say that, lets just say theres 2 speakers
> behind you and one behind the screen that you can't see.
>
> > and perhaps provide seating for two (might be
> > a big chair for two to curl up in...)
>
> If guests arrive I can produce extra seating at the push of a button.. well
> a few buttons anyway (object {sofa})
>
> > My personal taste would run to more futuristic looking
> > speakers. Perhaps spheres suspended from the ceiling
> > instead of the big-box look. And the blue cloth is not
> > what I would choose.
> >
> > Hey, you asked for comments :-) Nice work!
>
> Thanks!
> --
>
> Ian
>
> Inkwell: Ian's Homepage
> http://www.topcities.com/cartoon/inkwell/index.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ryan constantine" <rco### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:39A### [at] yahoocom...
> if it's a plasma display, there can't be a speaker behind it.
There's no fooling some people ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
sorry to say this, but the sound in that room would be pretty bad. the
walls need either a different shape or something on them to help the
sound or not get in its way. you may have noticed that most theaters
have curtains covering the walls nearly completely. other theaters have
nice oval shapes and/or saw tooth wall and ceilings. the reason of
course is accoustics. plain, flat walls bounce sound too much. also,
if you take a look at Home Theater Interiors magazine, you'll find that
most high end rooms have all the speakers recessed. and there is
usually only indirect lighting from wall sconces or alcoves. real
theater chairs and loveseats are also common although sofas are too.
good start though.
Ian Witham wrote:
>
> Drool..... anyway-- comments and suggestions appreciated as always :-)
>
> --
>
> Ian
>
> Inkwell: Ian's Homepage
> http://www.topcities.com/cartoon/inkwell/index.htm
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39A### [at] yahoocom>, ryan constantine
<rco### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> if it's a plasma display, there can't be a speaker behind it.
Why not?
Oh well...make it a printed organic LED screen...attach a piezoelectric
driver to the back, and the display could *be* the speaker. Sound would
likely be horrible though, and the vibrating display would probably give
people headaches.
BTW, has there been any recent progress with OLED technology? It looked
very promising when I first read about it(low power consumption, low
manufacturing cost, the ability to cheaply print them on many different
surfaces, such as flexible, transparent plastic or glass, high
resolution, short response time, etc.), but I haven't seen much more
about it...
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How about a library of DVDs and Videos along the wall?
And a 'bar' recessed into the other wall?
and a nice big sofa in the middle with pillows - and some speakers in the
corners?
"Ian Witham" <ian### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:39a54093@news.povray.org...
> Drool..... anyway-- comments and suggestions appreciated as always :-)
>
> --
>
> Ian
>
> Inkwell: Ian's Homepage
> http://www.topcities.com/cartoon/inkwell/index.htm
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Where's the DVD player / stereo equipment? Where's the big rack of movies?
Come on, those speakers are piddily...
;-)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ian Witham" <ian### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:39a54be2@news.povray.org...
|
| how else can I give it that backlit look? ambient works
| but doesn't cast a glow
Seems you might need media in that room then, and turn diffuse way up over
1. The MegaPov radiosity uses the diffuse amount and not the ambient
amount. Add 'media on' in the radiosity statement. Not sure if you'll ever
be able to get anything substantial without wrecking the rest of the scene.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Drool..... anyway-- comments and suggestions appreciated as always :-)
> --
> Ian
Nice, any script/program available for those plants?
/R
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39a58105@news.povray.org>, "Bob Hughes"
<per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:
> Seems you might need media in that room then, and turn diffuse way up
> over 1.
I don't think media would be necessary just to get light emitted from
the screen...
> The MegaPov radiosity uses the diffuse amount and not the ambient
> amount.
Actually, it uses the diffuse amount for the amount radiosity
contributes to the lighting of the object, but still uses the ambient
value for the amount of light from the object itself. You usually do a
glowing object by giving it a high ambient, though you should use
ambient 0 for non-glowing objects.
The old radiosity used the ambient value for the amount of radiosity
applied to the object, so ambient 0 meant that no radiosity would be
used for the object. This is what was changed in the new radiosity.
> Add 'media on' in the radiosity statement.
Why?
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
