 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How about 3? :)
http://www.pepeland.com/
http://www.3dluvr.com/marcosss/
http://www.3dluvr.com/marcosss/morearni/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Huff wrote:
> How does this syntax look?
> light_source {POSITION, COLOR, etc...
> specular |on|off|
> phong |on|off|
> diffuse |on|off|
> shadowless |on|off|
> etc...
> }
The problem is that shadowless lights don't give highlights...
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
> > About light_groups, I'm not familiar with them but it's certainly an
> > interesting solution. My idea, though, was to keep the light from lighting
>
> I don't get it. What is it that you want and don't want the light to do?
As far as my tests go (which doesn't mean much), these "good" radiosity settings
work very well when all objects are given something like ambient 0 diffuse 1.
The problem is that the absence of highlights give all the objects the same dull
plastic look. To get those, real lights are necessary, but then I have to
balance the finishes differently to compensate for the additional lights. All
I'd need would be a light source able to create highlights without contributing
to the scene luminosity and render time. Anyway, it's just an idea, and there's
still a lot to investigate with the current settings.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Look under "Radiosity" in the MegaPov Help file.
Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000 18:59:06 -0500, Tony[B] wrote:
>How about 3? :)
>
>http://www.pepeland.com/
>http://www.3dluvr.com/marcosss/
>http://www.3dluvr.com/marcosss/morearni/
Thanks Tony I'll have a look at these.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
12:34pm up 14 days, 16:52, 2 users, load average: 1.29, 1.19, 1.08
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39B4A40A.1D02BD98@inapg.inra.fr>, Gilles Tran
<tra### [at] inapginrafr> wrote:
> The problem is that shadowless lights don't give highlights...
They do now, but this syntax doesn't exist now(though some bits of it
do). There is no reason shadowless lights *can't* give highlights, that
was just a design choice which can be changed if/when this syntax is
added.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
>
> "Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> > > About light_groups, I'm not familiar with them but it's certainly an
> > > interesting solution. My idea, though, was to keep the light from lighting
> >
> > I don't get it. What is it that you want and don't want the light to do?
>
> As far as my tests go (which doesn't mean much), these "good" radiosity settings
> work very well when all objects are given something like ambient 0 diffuse 1.
> The problem is that the absence of highlights give all the objects the same dull
> plastic look. To get those, real lights are necessary, but then I have to
> balance the finishes differently to compensate for the additional lights. All
> I'd need would be a light source able to create highlights without contributing
> to the scene luminosity and render time.
Probably not possible to avoid an increase in render time until the day
that radiosity can produce highlights.. but have you considered using a
very dim light, and setting your highlights really high (say, "specular 10")?
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> >http://www.pepeland.com/
> >http://www.3dluvr.com/marcosss/
> >http://www.3dluvr.com/marcosss/morearni/
It's now been commercially released as "messiah:render",
assuming it's the same "Arnold".
See http://www.projectmessiah.com/news_frames.htm
Regards, Myles.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tony[B]
Subject: Re: Arnold's like part 2 - commercial release
Date: 6 Sep 2000 09:44:29
Message: <39b64a3d@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I thought it was funny for two radiosity projects to have the same name. Oh,
well, too bad for us poor POVers, eh? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Folks,
Here's my version of Gilles' image, with highlights.
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
>
> Probably not possible to avoid an increase in render time until the day
> that radiosity can produce highlights.. but have you considered using a
> very dim light, and setting your highlights really high (say, "specular 10")?
>
> -Xplo
This is the method I used; a large area light with a luminosity of 0.01
and a specular value of 80 in the finish.
Bye for now,
Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'testrad9.jpg' (30 KB)
Preview of image 'testrad9.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
