POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : YACELP (~224kau) Server Time
1 Oct 2024 22:22:39 EDT (-0400)
  YACELP (~224kau) (Message 21 to 27 of 27)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Alan Kong
Subject: Re: signatures
Date: 6 Aug 2000 16:51:42
Message: <k7jroskup8f4q6vmqkgp3ri88p7te7tgg4@4ax.com>
On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 23:50:45 -0500 "Bob Hughes"
<per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:

>Often it now turns out a ugly illegible
>scrawl, I know better signatures can be illegible too but are usually also
>great stylistic handwriting.
>Attached is my best with graphics pen and tablet.

  Bob, there's nothing wrong with your signature. I can easily make it
out - "Bob Higher" <g>.

-- 
Alan - ako### [at] povrayorg - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer


Post a reply to this message

From: Alan Kong
Subject: Re: signatures
Date: 6 Aug 2000 16:51:43
Message: <eajrosokakr5l0or04gloko4c8gc4kp496@4ax.com>
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000 09:15:30 -0400 "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

>I did the same thing. Still do. The only bank in a town I lived in told
>me that they would not accept my printed signature, so I messed it up a
>little but still printed it, and they took it.

  I guess they can tell you anything they want but (I think) you should
be able to print if you so choose, Bill. If they were concerned about
security of your account, even printing can yield telltale
discrepancies. It just may not be as apparent to the untrained eye.

-- 
Alan - ako### [at] povrayorg - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: signatures
Date: 6 Aug 2000 17:46:55
Message: <398DDADC.6AE44B30@faricy.net>
Bill DeWitt wrote:

>     I have an ongoing project to make my handwriting style in TTF. I have
> been working on it for 3 years and have about 10 letters done.

You know, there are services that will do that for you if you submit a sample
card.

--
David Fontaine     <dav### [at] faricynet>     ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: signatures
Date: 6 Aug 2000 17:53:02
Message: <398dde3e@news.povray.org>
"Alan Kong" <ako### [at] povrayNO-SPAMorg> wrote :
>
>   I guess they can tell you anything they want

    It was either that or drive 30 miles to the next bank.

> but (I think) you should
> be able to print if you so choose, Bill. If they were concerned about
> security of your account, even printing can yield telltale
> discrepancies. It just may not be as apparent to the untrained eye.

    I thought so too. I worked hard on my printed signature while learning
calligraphy and I had it just like I wanted it and I dared the bank clone to
try to reproduce it with any less effort than any other signature. Bunch of
dim bulbs.

    I have since returned to my printed signature. People can read my
writing and will be able to know what my name is if they see it. Now if I
could just avoid the Hairy Eyeball of Death when I laboriously hand print
the whole "William James DeWitt" on my checks in the hardware store line. Of
course it doesn't help that I printed "thirty seven dollars and ninety three
cents" too...

    People find me tedious.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: signatures
Date: 6 Aug 2000 19:22:59
Message: <398df353$1@news.povray.org>
"Alan Kong" <ako### [at] povrayNO-SPAMorg> wrote in message
news:k7jroskup8f4q6vmqkgp3ri88p7te7tgg4@4ax.com...
| On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 23:50:45 -0500 "Bob Hughes"
| <per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:
|
| >Often it now turns out a ugly illegible
| >scrawl, I know better signatures can be illegible too but are usually
also
| >great stylistic handwriting.
| >Attached is my best with graphics pen and tablet.
|
|   Bob, there's nothing wrong with your signature. I can easily make it
| out - "Bob Higher" <g>.

I did say that was a very clear sig there, not at all like when I sign
checks and things.  A little turbulence and skewed scaling on the image as a
mapped pigment in POV-Ray would soon show what it's really like.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: YACELP (~224kau)
Date: 6 Aug 2000 19:54:41
Message: <slrn8ortaa.lrt.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
Beautiful image, thanks Tony. 

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

 11:18pm  up 22 days, 21:45,  2 users,  load average: 1.13, 1.04, 1.01


Post a reply to this message

From: Josh English
Subject: Re: YACELP (~224kau)
Date: 7 Aug 2000 11:11:38
Message: <398ED1AC.489CBE3C@spiritone.com>
Very good. The sphere is getting better with every version of this. You're
getting closer to showing "infinity" in there.

Josh

"Tony[B]" wrote:

> Yet Another Crappy Eyelogo Presentation. This is my 7th so far. I like it.
> The sphere in the middle uses negative emission media... oooohh... I hope
> it's not that crappy. ;-) I did it a while ago, just got to post it. Enjoy.
>
>  [Image]

--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.