 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I tried to create water in the non-patched POV-Ray and this is my latest
attempt. I used a height field that has also been created with POV-Ray
using
an average pigment for two rotated marble patterns. The light source and
the
cylinder are used to check the reflection and the shadow.
The results are promising so far. What do you think?
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test.jpg' (15 KB)
Preview of image 'test.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks very promising! I'm not sure if I see flat
spots on the top of some waves or not. If so I
think you need to tweak the height field to give
generally pointy tops. Any thoughts on using a
pattern that repeats so this can be animated?
"Marc Schimmler" <sch### [at] ica uni-stuttgartde> wrote in message
news:396DC32C.AEE499FD@ica.uni-stuttgart.de...
> I tried to create water in the non-patched POV-Ray and this is my latest
> attempt. I used a height field that has also been created with POV-Ray
> using
> an average pigment for two rotated marble patterns. The light source and
> the
> cylinder are used to check the reflection and the shadow.
> The results are promising so far. What do you think?
>
> Marc
> --
> Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I dont have much time to use POV. So I'm not too familier with the details
The water Looks great!
What did you use for the sky, I like that too. I'm sure it's somthing
simple...
Alan
P.S. did you post this in HTML? with the image inline?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is very good, competitive with isosurfaces in looks at least I'd say. The
texturing is
exceptional too.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Nickerson wrote:
>
> I dont have much time to use POV. So I'm not too familier with the details
> The water Looks great!
>
Thank you!
> What did you use for the sky, I like that too. I'm sure it's somthing
> simple...
>
Yes, I guess you can call it simple. I post it to p.t.s-f .
> Alan
>
> P.S. did you post this in HTML? with the image inline?
Only plain text under Netscape with attach file (auto - detect).
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spock wrote:
>
> Looks very promising! I'm not sure if I see flat
> spots on the top of some waves or not. If so I
> think you need to tweak the height field to give
> generally pointy tops. Any thoughts on using a
> pattern that repeats so this can be animated?
>
Thank you!
Could be that they are flat somehow. I must tweak the
code a bit. I just played around for a few minutes with
it.
I'm using one height field which is copied 100 times
and where each row is randomly shifted to avoid strong
banding effects.
I guess animating would be difficult. You have generate
a heightfield for each frame ...
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> This is very good, competitive with isosurfaces in looks at least I'd say. The
texturing is
> exceptional too.
>
> Bob
Thank you Bob.
I haven't found time to work with Megapov (and won't in the
next months), therefore I thought about a trick and it worked for me.
I hope I can get to Megapov when everything settles down. I guess
that POV-Ray 3.5 will be out then (and I know this will take some
time ...).
I post the codes to p.t.s-f
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
>
[...]
> I'm using one height field which is copied 100 times
> and where each row is randomly shifted to avoid strong
> banding effects.
> I guess animating would be difficult. You have generate
> a heightfield for each frame ...
>
> Marc
How did you manage, that there is no visible break between the hf's? Doing
landscape scenes I could never avoid that, even if the heightfield was tilable.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
>
> How did you manage, that there is no visible break between the hf's? Doing
> landscape scenes I could never avoid that, even if the heightfield was tilable.
>
> Christoph
>
Sad fact is that there are visible lines. But look somehow natural (at
least in
this resolution ...).
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I had to do a gamma correct, and yes it looks great, even
AWESOME some might say.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:23am up 15 days, 2:04, 2 users, load average: 1.04, 1.05, 1.01
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
