 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
I tried to use POV for whole building visualisation,
its my shool project finished June 2000.
Images can be found at my homepage:
http://www.itam.cas.cz/~disnel
Disnel
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: POV-Ray used for visualisation of whole buliding
Date: 13 Jun 2000 13:47:30
Message: <394673b2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Disnel" <dis### [at] itam cascz> wrote in message
news:394661D5.C206CEDB@itam.cas.cz...
|
| I tried to use POV for whole building visualisation,
| its my shool project finished June 2000.
| Images can be found at my homepage:
|
| http://www.itam.cas.cz/~disnel
Liked the Magic Room. Your Guard Tower web page says: "Tower >guadring cost<
and shining with magic fire." so you need a typo fix there to say "guarding
coast" instead.
The building pictures are neat, however they have one of my pet peeves, low
contrast. I know, I don't manage to use high contrast always either, but I
try to :-) Just seems to me that any outdoor scene like that would have
nearly black shadow areas in at least some places along with near white
highlights, unless there is heavy haze/fog present. Otherwise the sense is an
overcast sky.
Great web site there too btw. Oh! except for another thing. IE complains to
me about the web page file extensions having those ?1e, ?1a, etc., there after
shtml.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Liked the Magic Room. Your Guard Tower web page says: "Tower >guadring cost<
> and shining with magic fire." so you need a typo fix there to say "guarding
> coast" instead.
Thanks, I could use spell checker in the future ;-)
> The building pictures are neat, however they have one of my pet peeves, low
> contrast. I know, I don't manage to use high contrast always either, but I
> try to :-) Just seems to me that any outdoor scene like that would have
> nearly black shadow areas in at least some places along with near white
> highlights, unless there is heavy haze/fog present. Otherwise the sense is an
> overcast sky.
Maybe, the aim was to create soft images. But high contrast can increase
3D effect of images, I can try it.
> Great web site there too btw. Oh! except for another thing. IE complains to
> me about the web page file extensions having those ?1e, ?1a, etc., there after
> shtml.
I tried it in IE and it had no problems, what exactly write your IE?
And URL?something is normally used in CGI scripts, I tried to use it
with Apache's mod_include and it works too.
>
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Amazing detail!
The grid patterns in the dome play tricks, it's hard to see the shape in
a 2D picture.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: POV-Ray used for visualisation of whole buliding
Date: 13 Jun 2000 15:35:10
Message: <39468cee@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Disnel" <dis### [at] itamcascz> wrote in message
news:39467819.51D92021@itam.cas.cz...
|
| I tried it in IE and it had no problems, what exactly write your IE?
| And URL?something is normally used in CGI scripts, I tried to use it
| with Apache's mod_include and it works too.
Internet Explorer version: 5.00.2919.6307
An error pops up stating that IE cannot open the URL and yet it still does,
simply telling me the extension isn't right for IE. Then I have to click the
[OK] button to get rid of the popup message. It's possible I suppose that
settings I have could be causing it but I wouldn't know which to uncheck.
One of your URLs for example is:
http://www.itam.cas.cz/~disnel/pov/towerImg.shtml?i4 and it's the part after
.shtml causing the problem.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Ian Burgmyer
Subject: Re: POV-Ray used for visualisation of whole buliding
Date: 14 Jun 2000 01:47:58
Message: <39471c8e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bob Hughes" <per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:39468cee@news.povray.org...
> Internet Explorer version: 5.00.2919.6307
Same version...no problems...
I don't even have a little yellow thing in the bottom left (which is the
minimization place for the dialog box you describe)
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
Please visit my site at http://www.spectere.com! :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like the cooling tower. It must have taken forever to model it. (or
did you use some macros ? ;-) )
Now how about tweaking the textures and light?
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And you have no problems with CGI scripts?
(URL like http://some.where/cgi-bin/script.cgi?var=1&var=2)
There is absolutelly legal to use '?' in URL.
>
> "Disnel" <dis### [at] itamcascz> wrote in message
> news:39467819.51D92021@itam.cas.cz...
> |
> | I tried it in IE and it had no problems, what exactly write your IE?
> | And URL?something is normally used in CGI scripts, I tried to use it
> | with Apache's mod_include and it works too.
>
> Internet Explorer version: 5.00.2919.6307
> An error pops up stating that IE cannot open the URL and yet it still does,
> simply telling me the extension isn't right for IE. Then I have to click the
> [OK] button to get rid of the popup message. It's possible I suppose that
> settings I have could be causing it but I wouldn't know which to uncheck.
> One of your URLs for example is:
> http://www.itam.cas.cz/~disnel/pov/towerImg.shtml?i4 and it's the part after
> .shtml causing the problem.
>
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Karl Pelzer wrote:
>
> I like the cooling tower. It must have taken forever to model it. (or
> did you use some macros ? ;-) )
> Now how about tweaking the textures and light?
>
> Karl
Yes, some macros were used ;-). I will release them in the future
as some "architectureal" include, containing macros for railing,
stairs and such things. Current verison, used in this scene, was
created with lack of time, because I had deadline for project in school,
and is very dumb.
What you mean with "tweaking textures and light?". I'am very bad in
enlish, sorry.
Disnel
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dis### [at] itamcascz wrote:
> Yes, some macros were used ;-). I will release them in the future
> as some "architectureal" include, containing macros for railing,
> stairs and such things.
wanna have wanna have wanna have ! (I think many more around here too)
> What you mean with "tweaking textures and light?". I'am very bad in
> enlish, sorry.
No need to worry about that. I'm German and I'm sure that I've made many
mistakes (maybe for the amusement of native readers).
With 'tweaking' I mean that the textures and light need a bit of
additional work.
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
