 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panama c-comnet> wrote in message
news:390dbdfd@news.povray.org...
> > Right! Anyone should be able to see that.
>
>
> Right, just like the invisible clothes I'm wearing...
>
Precisely.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I agree completely. I much prefer symbolic representation than literal
statement when it comes to logos.
"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:390da54f@news.povray.org...
>
> "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
> news:390d9889@news.povray.org...
> > And why do you feel that this logo says "POV-Ray"?
> >
>
> Well, it doesn't say "POV-Ray", at least not in words. But if used
(and
> I don't propose we do, in it's current incarnation), it would come to say
> "POV-Ray" by usage, much in the same way that the little swoop says
> "Nike"...
>
> It (or something like it) is a symbol that can be used to mean POV-Ray
> because we say so.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Know what's really sad about the Nike swoosh? It was designed by a graphic
design student at Portland State University, who sold it lock stock and barrel
for $60. At even a tenth of a penny per use she would be a millionaire several
times over...
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
> news:390d9889@news.povray.org...
> > And why do you feel that this logo says "POV-Ray"?
> >
>
> Well, it doesn't say "POV-Ray", at least not in words. But if used (and
> I don't propose we do, in it's current incarnation), it would come to say
> "POV-Ray" by usage, much in the same way that the little swoop says
> "Nike"...
>
> It (or something like it) is a symbol that can be used to mean POV-Ray
> because we say so.
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One of my friends parents, a chiropodist, gave NIKE the idea for the
common kink in the heal of the shoe and was offered 1% of the profits
but declined because they did it for a favour and for such a small
company. How he must regret being so kind.
G.
Josh English wrote:
>
> Know what's really sad about the Nike swoosh? It was designed by a graphic
> design student at Portland State University, who sold it lock stock and barrel
> for $60. At even a tenth of a penny per use she would be a millionaire several
> times over...
>
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> > "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
> > news:390d9889@news.povray.org...
> > > And why do you feel that this logo says "POV-Ray"?
> > >
> >
> > Well, it doesn't say "POV-Ray", at least not in words. But if used (and
> > I don't propose we do, in it's current incarnation), it would come to say
> > "POV-Ray" by usage, much in the same way that the little swoop says
> > "Nike"...
> >
> > It (or something like it) is a symbol that can be used to mean POV-Ray
> > because we say so.
>
> --
> Josh English
> eng### [at] spiritonecom
> "May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote in message <390dbdfd@news.povray.org>...
>> Right! Anyone should be able to see that.
>
>
>Right, just like the invisible clothes I'm wearing...
>
Greetings, Your Majesty! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'POVRay Logo 003.jpg' (14 KB)
Preview of image 'POVRay Logo 003.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pushed the button to fast.
Just another test that turned out kinda nice. Comments welcome. In case
you are wondering, it shows CSG and uses the three basic shapes, sphere,
cylinder, box. It also shows the three dimensions and (to me) looks a little
futuristic. It uses the camera_location as a parameter and allows scaling
and positioning.
I made a less nice one and for those who are 3D challenged, it makes a
decent 2D, 8 color image.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> ...
> Just another test that turned out kinda nice. Comments welcome.
I like this combination of shapes.
> In case
> you are wondering, it shows CSG and uses the three basic shapes, sphere,
> cylinder, box.
> ...
So you did not use torii where the sphere meets the planes (boxes)?
Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> Comments welcome. In case you are wondering, it shows CSG and
> uses the three basic shapes, sphere, cylinder, box.
All you need is sphere and box...
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http:/www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote :
>
> All you need is sphere and box...
>
All I used was sphere and cylinder, but it made a box so I counted that
too.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
