I agree completely. I much prefer symbolic representation than literal
statement when it comes to logos.

"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:390da54f@news.povray.org...
>
> "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
> news:390d9889@news.povray.org...
> > And why do you feel that this logo says "POV-Ray"?
> >
>
>     Well, it doesn't say "POV-Ray", at least not in words. But if used
(and
> I don't propose we do, in it's current incarnation), it would come to say
> "POV-Ray" by usage, much in the same way that the little swoop says
> "Nike"...
>
>     It (or something like it) is a symbol that can be used to mean POV-Ray
> because we say so.
>
>

Post a reply to this message