 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The idea for this one originally came from a concept I called "Snowman's
Vacation", which involved a small, sandy desert island, an ocean, a
glass snowman, and maybe a couple of palm trees. Unfortunately, my
machine is too feeble to render palm trees, so I made this instead
(which still took over 30 hours, IIRC.. damn this slow old bus).
There's a lot I don't like about this one now, but I thought the water
looked pretty damn impressive.
--
Xplo Eristotle
http://start.at/xplosion/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ritual640.jpg' (96 KB)
Preview of image 'ritual640.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Xplo Eristotle" <inq### [at] unforgettable com>
> There's a lot I don't like about this one now, but I thought the water
> looked pretty damn impressive.
I like the foreground, but the background height field does not look very
good, too noisy I think. The orange thing(s) are cool, reminds me a bit of
hammered copper, although a bit too orange to be copper. Facet normal? The
water is, as you say, pretty damn impressive!
The thing on the right looks like a glass snowman, I'm not sure whether
that's good or bad :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I agree - the water and the foreground rock are impressive!
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxiscom www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"Sebastian Strand" <the### [at] bigfootcom> wrote in message
news:38d68db5@news.povray.org...
>
> "Xplo Eristotle" <inq### [at] unforgettablecom>
> > There's a lot I don't like about this one now, but I thought the water
> > looked pretty damn impressive.
>
> I like the foreground, but the background height field does not look very
> good, too noisy I think. The orange thing(s) are cool, reminds me a bit of
> hammered copper, although a bit too orange to be copper. Facet normal? The
> water is, as you say, pretty damn impressive!
> The thing on the right looks like a glass snowman, I'm not sure whether
> that's good or bad :)
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian Strand wrote:
>
> I like the foreground, but the background height field does not look very
> good, too noisy I think.
I intended for it to have a raw volcanic sort of look to it, and I think
it accomplishes that nicely.. but as you say, it IS a bit rough. The
truth is, you're only seeing the top fraction of the height field; it
had some massive y scaling to get the jagged-silhouette look. There are
better ways to do that, but I didn't want to mess with them.
> The orange thing(s) are cool, reminds me a bit of
> hammered copper, although a bit too orange to be copper. Facet normal?
Facet normal, yep. The miscoloration wasn't intentional, for what it's
worth. At some point before I did the final render, it looked much more
coppery.. I'm not sure why it came out that way.
> The thing on the right looks like a glass snowman, I'm not sure whether
> that's good or bad :)
That's good! It IS a glass snowman. :)
--
Xplo Eristotle
http://start.at/xplosion/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
how was the big rock done...?
please don't say isosurface... please...
(official user)
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> The idea for this one originally came from a concept I called "Snowman's
> Vacation", which involved a small, sandy desert island, an ocean, a
> glass snowman, and maybe a couple of palm trees. Unfortunately, my
> machine is too feeble to render palm trees, so I made this instead
> (which still took over 30 hours, IIRC.. damn this slow old bus).
>
> There's a lot I don't like about this one now, but I thought the water
> looked pretty damn impressive.
>
> --
> Xplo Eristotle
> http://start.at/xplosion/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Moon47 wrote:
>
> how was the big rock done...?
The altar thingy in the foreground, you mean?
> please don't say isosurface... please...
Okay, I won't. ;)
--
Xplo Eristotle
http://start.at/xplosion/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> Moon47 wrote:
> >
> > how was the big rock done...?
>
> The altar thingy in the foreground, you mean?
>
> > please don't say isosurface... please...
>
> Okay, I won't. ;)
DANG...
||
^
>
>
> --
> Xplo Eristotle
> http://start.at/xplosion/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Moon47 skrev i meldingen <38D550DB.92579F77@earthlink.net>...
>how was the big rock done...?
>please don't say isosurface... please...
>(official user)
>
Don't you _like_ the isosurface? I mean; such a powerful feature should make
us glad!
Simen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think it is great but i will not leave the official vers. as i have probably
said numerous times the GUI of mega disturbs me not to mention the fact it does
not save files to simple text... ect... ect... ect...
so you see i love the function just not the package it comes in...
I am thinking of ( trying ) recompiling the official w/ the various useful
patches...?
Simen Kvaal wrote:
> Moon47 skrev i meldingen <38D550DB.92579F77@earthlink.net>...
> >how was the big rock done...?
> >please don't say isosurface... please...
> >(official user)
> >
>
> Don't you _like_ the isosurface? I mean; such a powerful feature should make
> us glad!
>
> Simen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Moon47" <rdm### [at] earthlinknet> wrote :
>
> I think it is great but i will not leave the official vers. as i have
probably
> said numerous times the GUI of mega disturbs me not to mention the fact it
does
> not save files to simple text... ect... ect... ect
>
Is this a joke?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
