 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:42:38 -0500, Chris Huff
<chr### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
>In article <389e7642@news.povray.org>, "Mick Hazelgrove"
><mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
>
>> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
>Great image! Especially the grass and the flower-things...the footpath
>to the portal was also done well.
>Only one thing...the portal appears to open into empty space. Shouldn't
>the atmosphere be rushing through the portal, creating a small tornado
>and sucking everything in the area along with it? Or does the physics of
>the portal prevent that?(a gravitational field surrounding the other
>"end" of the portal, strong enough to hold a spherical cloud of
>atmosphere with enough pressure to keep the air from passing through?)
>Or am I just over-analyzing?
Perhaps the physics of this portal only allows fast-moving things like
light to get through, and not large slowly moving objects such as
molecules of air? In this case, the portal is not something that one
could travel through, but only an "observation window."
later,
Glen Berry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Glen Berry wrote:
> Perhaps the physics of this portal only allows fast-moving things like
> light to get through, and not large slowly moving objects such as
> molecules of air? In this case, the portal is not something that one
> could travel through, but only an "observation window."
No, the space landscape was painted on a large canvas and stretched over the
hole, in order to fool imaginative sci-fi fans. I guess that a close-up would
reveal some nails and strings holding the thing.
Very nice image, btw.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One of the best POV images ever. Would love to
see it as a stereoscopic pair.
Harold
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk (Mick Hazelgrove) wrote in
<389e7642@news.povray.org>:
>The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
Spectacular! I just have to break my own rule here and ask you for the
arch code. I assume it's a torus with some sort of iso-surface applied to
it? The arch by itself would have blown me away, but then you went ahead
and placed it in a really nice scene. Very good job!
Rich
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As I've said before, I'm a big fan of your work: if I got better, I
think I'd like to do work like yours.
The clouds, however, in some of your recent work, I don't like. It may
simply be a function of the camera angle. It portrays a sense of
urgency, movement, dramatic framing, and this often seems out of place
in your drawings.
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I really like these, keep 'em comming.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:52pm up 4:49, 6 users, load average: 1.69, 1.18, 1.06
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the clouds, especially in this image really help! I know what you
mean by the sense of urgency you talk about but I think it really fits in
here.
"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> As I've said before, I'm a big fan of your work: if I got better, I
> think I'd like to do work like yours.
>
> The clouds, however, in some of your recent work, I don't like. It may
> simply be a function of the camera angle. It portrays a sense of
> urgency, movement, dramatic framing, and this often seems out of place
> in your drawings.
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> > The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
> >
> > Mick
> >
> > --
> > *************************************************************
> > http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
> >
> > *************************************************************
> >
> > [Image]
--
Come visit my web site:-) : http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, maybe it's more appropriate for this one. I think there was a more
serene landscape a week or so ago and I never took the time to comment.
Thomas Lake wrote:
> I think the clouds, especially in this image really help! I know what you
> mean by the sense of urgency you talk about but I think it really fits in
> here.
>
> "Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> > The clouds, however, in some of your recent work, I don't like. It may
> > simply be a function of the camera angle. It portrays a sense of
> > urgency, movement, dramatic framing, and this often seems out of place
> > in your drawings.
> >
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like It pretty much (the first one too), how does it work? how would it
doing something else..
Matthias
Mick Hazelgrove <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
389e7642@news.povray.org...
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
