 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
For what it's worth, Ian's right - this address traces back to
@home.com, and since cable modems are static IP addresses, this makes
the odds of it not being Nick very small.
<sigh>
Ian Burgmyer wrote:
>
> Nope. I *think* (correct me if I'm wrong) that it is actually the extended
> headers in the newsgroup post. This gives a detailed explanation of the
> authors name, E-Mail address, the format from the post (text/html,
> text/plain, or something like that), some other info, and the poster's IP
> address. The IP address identifies someone on the Internet. It is of the
> format x.x.x.x, with x being an integer from 0 to 255. Since Nick has cable
> modem (SUPER FAST) services through @Home.com, his never changes. However,
> with a dial-up ISP, it changes more-often-then-not. Right now, my IP is
> 208.210.22.16. Now next time I dial up to my ISP, it could change. Maybe
> to 208.210.22.10 or even 208.210.22.99. Usually, on these dynamic IP's
> (where it changes), the last number changes.
>
> Scott noticed, by looking at the message headers, that Nick's (being a cable
> modem user through @home) IP was 24.0.254.216 in both messages. Good sign
> of an attempted cover up.
>
> Hope this helps :)
>
> -Ian
>
> Nathan R. Zwalsh <nrz### [at] fatnet net> wrote in message
> news:3727DA25.787A358E@fatnet.net...
> >
> >
> >
> > I did notice one thing though, I'm no internet pro and dont know what a
> nntp
> > address is, but i'm assuming that it I.D's the e-mail server in nick's
> case
> > (Hot mail.com) which is a very popular free e-mail server and anyone could
> > use it. But i could be wrong..
> >
> > Nathan Zwalsh
> >
> > ps Scott McDonald A.K.A Sherlock Holmes . good detective work.
> >
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I agree. But on the other hand, he didn't pull the wool over this newsgroups
eyes, did he? Your posting was the most entertaining turn yet (for me,
anyway). We may not ever turn Nicholas from the Dark Side, but we can at
least enjoy his antics.
Scott McDonald <sco### [at] metrolinkcom> wrote in message
news:3727D99E.D041CF5D@metrolink.com...
> <sigh> it just makes me sad. If he'd come in as a new user of POV and
> wanted to learn instead of show off, this would have been much
> different.
>
> David Cook wrote:
> >
> > Wow, nice sleuthing Scott. Your fingering Nicholas once again was as
amusing
> > addition to this ongoing saga. Although I'm only a humble, occasion, but
> > legitimate, contributor to this newsgroup, I've been entertained by the
> > antics and subsequent exposures of this guy. This is the most hilarious
> > posting yet. Keep 'em coming Nicholas!
> >
> > Scott McDonald <sco### [at] metrolinkcom> wrote in message
> > news:3727D462.E57B8DF9@metrolink.com...
> > > Hmmm. I wonder who _ could be? Note the nntp-host please.
> > >
> > > Reply-To: "_" <_@_.com>
> > > From: "_" <_@_.com>
> > > Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
> > > Subject: Shut up Spider
> > > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:44:38 -0400
> > > Lines: 7
> > > X-Priority: 3
> > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
> > > NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
> > > Message-ID: <3727b9b3.0@news.povray.org>
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > now watch me pull a rabbit out of the news archives:
> > >
> > > Reply-To: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
> > > From: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
> > > Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
> > > Subject: AWSOME ROLEX WATCH!
> > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:02:38 -0400
> > > Lines: 1177
> > > X-Priority: 3
> > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
> > > NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
> > >
> > > A note to the kids out there, the internet isn't as anonymous as you
may
> > > think.
> > >
> > > Another note, you don't have to pretend to be a genius at POV to be
> > > accepted here - the few months I've spent in here have dramatically
> > > improved my pictures, and I've never seen anyone told that they suck
for
> > > anything they've done while learning to use POV.
> > >
> > >
> > > scott.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, most @home addresses are 24.x.x.x. I know several people with cable
modems (all through @home) and they are ALL 24.x.x.x.
It's depressing. . .Nick may have been a great artist some day. . .instead
he's a good for nothing little. . .[censored]
:|
-Ian
Scott McDonald <sco### [at] metrolinkcom> wrote in message
news:3727DDB8.6EE69996@metrolink.com...
> For what it's worth, Ian's right - this address traces back to
> @home.com, and since cable modems are static IP addresses, this makes
> the odds of it not being Nick very small.
>
> <sigh>
>
> Ian Burgmyer wrote:
> >
> > Nope. I *think* (correct me if I'm wrong) that it is actually the
extended
> > headers in the newsgroup post. This gives a detailed explanation of the
> > authors name, E-Mail address, the format from the post (text/html,
> > text/plain, or something like that), some other info, and the poster's
IP
> > address. The IP address identifies someone on the Internet. It is of
the
> > format x.x.x.x, with x being an integer from 0 to 255. Since Nick has
cable
> > modem (SUPER FAST) services through @Home.com, his never changes.
However,
> > with a dial-up ISP, it changes more-often-then-not. Right now, my IP is
> > 208.210.22.16. Now next time I dial up to my ISP, it could change.
Maybe
> > to 208.210.22.10 or even 208.210.22.99. Usually, on these dynamic IP's
> > (where it changes), the last number changes.
> >
> > Scott noticed, by looking at the message headers, that Nick's (being a
cable
> > modem user through @home) IP was 24.0.254.216 in both messages. Good
sign
> > of an attempted cover up.
> >
> > Hope this helps :)
> >
> > -Ian
> >
> > Nathan R. Zwalsh <nrz### [at] fatnetnet> wrote in message
> > news:3727DA25.787A358E@fatnet.net...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I did notice one thing though, I'm no internet pro and dont know what
a
> > nntp
> > > address is, but i'm assuming that it I.D's the e-mail server in nick's
> > case
> > > (Hot mail.com) which is a very popular free e-mail server and anyone
could
> > > use it. But i could be wrong..
> > >
> > > Nathan Zwalsh
> > >
> > > ps Scott McDonald A.K.A Sherlock Holmes . good detective work.
> > >
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Typo. . .I meant this:
"instead, he had to act like a good for nothing little. . .[censored]
It's late. G'night!
-Ian
Ian Burgmyer <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3727dec5.0@news.povray.org...
> Yes, most @home addresses are 24.x.x.x. I know several people with cable
> modems (all through @home) and they are ALL 24.x.x.x.
>
> It's depressing. . .Nick may have been a great artist some day. . .instead
> he's a good for nothing little. . .[censored]
>
> :|
>
> -Ian
>
> Scott McDonald <sco### [at] metrolinkcom> wrote in message
> news:3727DDB8.6EE69996@metrolink.com...
> > For what it's worth, Ian's right - this address traces back to
> > @home.com, and since cable modems are static IP addresses, this makes
> > the odds of it not being Nick very small.
> >
> > <sigh>
> >
> > Ian Burgmyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope. I *think* (correct me if I'm wrong) that it is actually the
> extended
> > > headers in the newsgroup post. This gives a detailed explanation of
the
> > > authors name, E-Mail address, the format from the post (text/html,
> > > text/plain, or something like that), some other info, and the poster's
> IP
> > > address. The IP address identifies someone on the Internet. It is of
> the
> > > format x.x.x.x, with x being an integer from 0 to 255. Since Nick has
> cable
> > > modem (SUPER FAST) services through @Home.com, his never changes.
> However,
> > > with a dial-up ISP, it changes more-often-then-not. Right now, my IP
is
> > > 208.210.22.16. Now next time I dial up to my ISP, it could change.
> Maybe
> > > to 208.210.22.10 or even 208.210.22.99. Usually, on these dynamic
IP's
> > > (where it changes), the last number changes.
> > >
> > > Scott noticed, by looking at the message headers, that Nick's (being a
> cable
> > > modem user through @home) IP was 24.0.254.216 in both messages. Good
> sign
> > > of an attempted cover up.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps :)
> > >
> > > -Ian
> > >
> > > Nathan R. Zwalsh <nrz### [at] fatnetnet> wrote in message
> > > news:3727DA25.787A358E@fatnet.net...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I did notice one thing though, I'm no internet pro and dont know
what
> a
> > > nntp
> > > > address is, but i'm assuming that it I.D's the e-mail server in
nick's
> > > case
> > > > (Hot mail.com) which is a very popular free e-mail server and anyone
> could
> > > > use it. But i could be wrong..
> > > >
> > > > Nathan Zwalsh
> > > >
> > > > ps Scott McDonald A.K.A Sherlock Holmes . good detective work.
> > > >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think it quite the homage paid to all involved that said person took the
extra time and sincere effort to purchase a thesaurus and run Spell-Check.
it reminds me of a story...
once upon a time there was a man who had grown an ill favor towards his
neighbor and decided to express his ire in person. He shouted his position
at the unaware neighbor, but to the surprise of the man it bore little
reaction. In frustration the man began to throw handfuls of dirt at his
neighbor hoping to soil his unaffected disposition. The neighbor did little
more than casually dodge the aggregate onslaught. Enraged that the object of
his anger remained untouched, the man got a shovel and began to lob heaps of
dirt, rocks, sod and root at his neighbor. This continued until at last,
spent and exhausted, bent over and panting at the bottom of a deep hole, the
man surrendered his folly. Climbing out of the hole, the man grumbled, "To
hell with you", and sauntered off, defeated. Reaching for his garden hose,
the neighbor called out to the man," Thank you for the pool, perhaps when it
is filled you would like to cool off!".
good night- ;-]
KB-
Scott McDonald wrote:
> Hmmm. I wonder who _ could be? Note the nntp-host please.
>
> Reply-To: "_" <_@_.com>
> From: "_" <_@_.com>
> Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
> Subject: Shut up Spider
> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:44:38 -0400
> Lines: 7
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
> Message-ID: <3727b9b3.0@news.povray.org>
> --------------------------------------------------
> now watch me pull a rabbit out of the news archives:
>
> Reply-To: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
> From: "Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
> Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images
> Subject: AWSOME ROLEX WATCH!
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:02:38 -0400
> Lines: 1177
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.0.254.216
>
> A note to the kids out there, the internet isn't as anonymous as you may
> think.
>
> Another note, you don't have to pretend to be a genius at POV to be
> accepted here - the few months I've spent in here have dramatically
> improved my pictures, and I've never seen anyone told that they suck for
> anything they've done while learning to use POV.
>
> scott.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Kress wrote:
>
> When you have the courage to identify yourself, maybe you'll generate some
> useful discussion.
>
From:
"Nicholas DePetrillo" <N1h### [at] hotmailcom>
Newsgroups:
povray.binaries.images
References:
<3720f6de.0@news.povray.org>
<3720f8d8.0@news.povray.org>
Subject:
Re: Pyramid fractal sort of....
Date:
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 19:02:13 -0400
Lines:
41
X-Priority:
3
X-MSMail-Priority:
Normal
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
NNTP-Posting-Host:
24.0.254.216
------------
From:
"_" <_@_.com>
Newsgroups:
povray.binaries.images
Subject:
Shut up Spider
Date:
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:44:38 -0400
Lines:
7
X-Priority:
3
X-MSMail-Priority:
Normal
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
NNTP-Posting-Host:
24.0.254.216
------------
conclusion?
--
// Rikard Bosnjakovic - http://a214.ryd.student.liu.se/ - ICQ: 1158217
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That
way, if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away - and barefoot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice Catch!
Detective Scott McDonald, POV's very own private-eye.
Incidentally, to Ken and Spider when it comes to my posts
feel free to fire away! I could use all the help I can get.
--
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After mostly lurking here for the last few months and reading nearly every
post here, I must say that these attacks are very uncalled for. I can't
recall ever reading a reply from either Ken or Spider that was anything
other than honest and helpful. Most of the ones I've seen from them have
been very positive of the images presented here.
Besides that, I don't think anyone who says things in such an inflammatory
manner can really be taken seriously when posting anonymously.
Rygad
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
All I can say is that is a great piece of detective work. Wish I had
thought of it first. Also wish I had replied when I first saw it. Oh well,
such is life that we must put up with this sort of behavior from those who
will not take the time to learn real skill.
Rygad
Note- I am far too awed by the regular postings here to add my immature and
simple abstract images to the esteemed collection here.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
He even tried if his changed name worked correct.
Two minutes before he posted here he tested it at binary.utilities.
Well Nicholas ... you are welcome here if you post you *OWN* work here
and if keep to a certain level of politeness even after the things
you've done here. If keep on going in the direction you do now you
better be careful!
This all I have to say to this unpleasant story.
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
