 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, yes I can see it now and.... it was definitely worth it.
Thanks to Alan and congratulations to Mike.
Fabien
> <ffj### [at] club-internet fr> wrote:
>
> >Euh hum. While readind this post, I only got a bunch of weird number and letters.
The
> >image is UUencoded. Does anyone know what I should do to make Messenger able to
read
> >it ?
>
> >> begin 644 Camera.jpg
> >> M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`2`!(``#_VP!#``8$!08%!`8&!08'!P8("A`*"@D)
> <snip - next 1000+ lines of garbage text omitted to save disk space>
>
> Hi, Fabien. We will take your word for it. This is what the others in
> this thread are discussing now. It isn't necessary to re-post the
> garbage text characters of the uuencoded image as a quote.
>
> I'm going to attempt to re-post Mike Williams' bellows camera,
> "Camera.jpg", as an attachment to this message. I hope everyone will be
> able to decode the image when posted by me. If not, it was worth a try.
>
> --
> Alan - ako### [at] povrayorg - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
> http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> wrote:
: For now, launch up OE, the image's worth the trouble.
If you tell me how do I do that in this SparcStation, I would be very happy.
I think that a better solution would be that the original poster posted
the image as anyone else do.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for quoting the whole original article (all the tens of kilobytes
of garbage of it). We appreciate it very much.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for quoting the whole original article (all the tens of kilobytes
of it). We appreciate it very much.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's the textual representation of the code for the image and thanks for
making me download all 90kb of it -again-
"ryan mooney" <rdm### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:38685683.F07ABB29@earthlink.net...
> Um what is all this ... junk ... where's the beef ??? i mean .jpg
>
> Mike Williams wrote:
>
> > There's no fancy techniques going on here. There's just one awkward
> > shape (the bellows) that took a bit of thought.
> >
> > [ Section: 1/1 File: Camera.jpg UUencoded by: Turnpike Integrated
Version 4.02 S ]
> >
> > begin 644 Camera.jpg
> > M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`2`!(``#_VP!#``8$!08%!`8&!08'!P8("A`*"@D)
> > M"A0.#PP0%Q08&!<4%A8:'24?&ALC'!86("P@(R8G*2HI&1\M,"TH,"4H*2C_
> > MVP!#`0<'!PH("A,*"A,H&A8:*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Juha wrote:
> Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> wrote:
> : For now, launch up OE, the image's worth the trouble.
>
> If you tell me how do I do that in this SparcStation, I would be very happy.
>
> I think that a better solution would be that the original poster posted
> the image as anyone else do.
Turns out that the original poster is using a broken newsreader. If he posts in
MIME, MS Outlook 2000 is broken and can't handle the RFC-complient MIME. If he
posts as UUEncoding, it works with MS Outlook, but the newsreader does the wrong
thing and Netscape obeys it and displays it as plain text instead of an image.
Once MS Outlook is fixed, then he'll have no problems. (I'm holding my breath
now)
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29 Dec 1999 06:34:13 -0500, Nieminen Juha
<war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote:
> If you tell me how do I do that in this SparcStation, I would be very happy.
Et tuus, Warpus, contra me? I noticed that Richard was using Windows,
supposed he had IE and gave him the simplest, fastest and cheapest
solution to view that particular post, _nothing_more_than_that_. When
are you guys going to stop flaming me?
> I think that a better solution would be that the original poster posted
>the image as anyone else do.
It was not his fault and the authors of his newsreader should be
informed about the issue by now.
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov wrote:
> On 29 Dec 1999 06:34:13 -0500, Nieminen Juha
> <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote:
> > I think that a better solution would be that the original poster posted
> >the image as anyone else do.
>
> It was not his fault and the authors of his newsreader should be
> informed about the issue by now.
>
> Peter Popov
> pet### [at] usanet
> ICQ: 15002700
yes, they were...
but they claim it's a feature, not a bug. want to help me straighten them out?
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> wrote:
: Et tuus, Warpus, contra me? I noticed that Richard was using Windows,
: supposed he had IE and gave him the simplest, fastest and cheapest
: solution to view that particular post, _nothing_more_than_that_.
What makes you think that he is the only one who wants to see the image
and is unable to do it for the reason mentioned elsewhere in this thread?
: When
: are you guys going to stop flaming me?
I'm not flaming _you_ personally. I'm flaming everyone who thinks that
everybody is using Windows.
If I offended you, then I apologize.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Juha wrote:
> Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> wrote:
> : Et tuus, Warpus, contra me? I noticed that Richard was using Windows,
> : supposed he had IE and gave him the simplest, fastest and cheapest
> : solution to view that particular post, _nothing_more_than_that_.
>
> What makes you think that he is the only one who wants to see the image
> and is unable to do it for the reason mentioned elsewhere in this thread?
Oh, I dunno. Maybe the header line from Richard's post that said:
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I)
-----------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> : When
> : are you guys going to stop flaming me?
>
> I'm not flaming _you_ personally. I'm flaming everyone who thinks that
> everybody is using Windows.
> If I offended you, then I apologize.
Oh, I dunno, maybe this part?
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I)
------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
