POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Nuke_um ! Server Time
4 Oct 2024 09:16:27 EDT (-0400)
  Nuke_um ! (Message 24 to 33 of 33)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Lewis
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 20 Apr 1999 21:31:12
Message: <371D1CC9.BFFF9E8E@netvision.net.il>
Now I know where Ken got all his nuclear education from. I just wish he
keeps it to develop nice images in pov and nothing else...


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 20 Apr 1999 21:50:47
Message: <371D212B.FF408A@pacbell.net>
Thomas Lake wrote:

> Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface patch?

I recall seeing a recent upgrade announcement for it in the
povray.programming newsgroup. I'll dig it up later for you
if need be but it's not been there for more than a month or
so and should not take you too long to find it yourself.

-- 
Ken Tyler

mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 20 Apr 1999 22:04:42
Message: <371D21AE.67CAAC0@ndirect.co.uk>
I would have thought that something like the isosurface patch
would have been on Uncle Ken's Links Page.

Cheers
Steve 

Ken wrote:
> 
> Thomas Lake wrote:
> 
> > Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface patch?
> 
> I recall seeing a recent upgrade announcement for it in the
> povray.programming newsgroup. I'll dig it up later for you
> if need be but it's not been there for more than a month or
> so and should not take you too long to find it yourself.
> 
> --
> Ken Tyler
> 
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 20 Apr 1999 22:20:34
Message: <371D2827.32A75F3B@pacbell.net>
Steve wrote:
> 
> I would have thought that something like the isosurface patch
> would have been on Uncle Ken's Links Page.

There I was just minding my own buisness when out of nowhere this guy
comes running up and steals it from me. I tried to catch him but he
was too fast for me. Since then I just haven't had the time to replace
it. It's on my to do list.

Satisfied with my answer ?

-- 
Ken Tyler

mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 20 Apr 1999 23:12:06
Message: <371D33CA.528DB56F@ndirect.co.uk>
Quick thinking :-)

Ken wrote:
> 
> Steve wrote:
> >
> > I would have thought that something like the isosurface patch
> > would have been on Uncle Ken's Links Page.
> 
> There I was just minding my own buisness when out of nowhere this guy
> comes running up and steals it from me. I tried to catch him but he
> was too fast for me. Since then I just haven't had the time to replace
> it. It's on my to do list.
> 
> Satisfied with my answer ?
> 
> --
> Ken Tyler
> 
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 21 Apr 1999 00:22:23
Message: <371D45C4.DA1A3ECD@home.com>
Got the link. Thanks Ken!

Ken wrote:

> Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> > Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface patch?
>
> I recall seeing a recent upgrade announcement for it in the
> povray.programming newsgroup. I'll dig it up later for you
> if need be but it's not been there for more than a month or
> so and should not take you too long to find it yourself.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Margus Ramst
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 21 Apr 1999 10:23:47
Message: <371dd163.0@news.povray.org>
Thomas Lake wrote in message <371D07D1.E2C4CCC9@home.com>...
>
>Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface
patch?
>


You already got the link, but I should add that an earlier version of the
Isosurface patch is also included in the Superpatch. Might come in handy to
have the functionality of the both.

Margus


Post a reply to this message

From: B  Katt
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 22 Apr 1999 20:10:52
Message: <01be8d15$5ca80f20$41dbc9cf@default>
I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since 
childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear
tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others 
have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the 
blast.  

If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and
such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive
at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html

There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info 
on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about
nukes but were afraid to ask. . .

B. Katt 
-- 
To reply via e-mail, please remove spamblock. 

> Disclaimer: nuking of any form is not necessarily endorsed by the maker
> of this image nor implied to be by the newsgroup proprietors. But you
> may want to check with the original creator and poster(s) as to their
> beliefs.
> 
> How's that for legal mumbo-jumbo?
> 
> 
> -- 
>  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>   http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
>  mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 22 Apr 1999 22:04:35
Message: <371FC6C5.102E77A4@pacbell.net>
B. Katt wrote:
> 
> I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since
> childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear
> tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others
> have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the
> blast.
> 
> If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and
> such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive
> at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html
> 
> There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info
> on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about
> nukes but were afraid to ask. . .
> 
> B. Katt

I have been looking for a good link to imagery like this and
thank you for sharing it with us.

-- 
Ken Tyler

mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Nuke_um !
Date: 23 Apr 1999 00:32:42
Message: <371FE9A5.C668B399@aol.com>
Maybe more than I ever wanted to know.
The shockwave addition image is attatched to one of my replies here. The
third image of 3. Four if you count Kens initial "nuke object".
Looking at some other pictures it becomes apparent almost any shape
could be used. A turbulent media in a sphere container would suffice. I
like Kens lathe shape best.


"B. Katt" wrote:
> 
> I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since
> childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear
> tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others
> have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the
> blast.
> 
> If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and
> such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive
> at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html
> 
> There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info
> on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about
> nukes but were afraid to ask. . .
> 
> B. Katt
> --
> To reply via e-mail, please remove spamblock.
> 
> > Disclaimer: nuking of any form is not necessarily endorsed by the maker
> > of this image nor implied to be by the newsgroup proprietors. But you
> > may want to check with the original creator and poster(s) as to their
> > beliefs.
> >
> > How's that for legal mumbo-jumbo?
> >
> >
> > --
> >  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> >   http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> >  mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.