Thomas Lake wrote:
> Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface patch?
I recall seeing a recent upgrade announcement for it in the
povray.programming newsgroup. I'll dig it up later for you
if need be but it's not been there for more than a month or
so and should not take you too long to find it yourself.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
I would have thought that something like the isosurface patch
would have been on Uncle Ken's Links Page.
Cheers
Steve
Ken wrote:
> > Thomas Lake wrote:> > > Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface patch?> > I recall seeing a recent upgrade announcement for it in the> povray.programming newsgroup. I'll dig it up later for you> if need be but it's not been there for more than a month or> so and should not take you too long to find it yourself.> > --> Ken Tyler> > mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Steve wrote:
> > I would have thought that something like the isosurface patch> would have been on Uncle Ken's Links Page.
There I was just minding my own buisness when out of nowhere this guy
comes running up and steals it from me. I tried to catch him but he
was too fast for me. Since then I just haven't had the time to replace
it. It's on my to do list.
Satisfied with my answer ?
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Quick thinking :-)
Ken wrote:
> > Steve wrote:> >> > I would have thought that something like the isosurface patch> > would have been on Uncle Ken's Links Page.> > There I was just minding my own buisness when out of nowhere this guy> comes running up and steals it from me. I tried to catch him but he> was too fast for me. Since then I just haven't had the time to replace> it. It's on my to do list.> > Satisfied with my answer ?> > --> Ken Tyler> > mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Got the link. Thanks Ken!
Ken wrote:
> Thomas Lake wrote:>> > Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface patch?>> I recall seeing a recent upgrade announcement for it in the> povray.programming newsgroup. I'll dig it up later for you> if need be but it's not been there for more than a month or> so and should not take you too long to find it yourself.>> --> Ken Tyler>> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Thomas Lake wrote in message <371D07D1.E2C4CCC9@home.com>...
>>Could you or someone else give me the home page url for the isosurface
patch?
>
You already got the link, but I should add that an earlier version of the
Isosurface patch is also included in the Superpatch. Might come in handy to
have the functionality of the both.
Margus
I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since
childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear
tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others
have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the
blast.
If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and
such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive
at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html
There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info
on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about
nukes but were afraid to ask. . .
B. Katt
--
To reply via e-mail, please remove spamblock.
> Disclaimer: nuking of any form is not necessarily endorsed by the maker> of this image nor implied to be by the newsgroup proprietors. But you> may want to check with the original creator and poster(s) as to their> beliefs.> > How's that for legal mumbo-jumbo?> > > -- > omniVERSE: beyond the universe> http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm> mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
B. Katt wrote:
> > I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since> childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear> tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others> have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the> blast.> > If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and> such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive> at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html> > There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info> on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about> nukes but were afraid to ask. . .> > B. Katt
I have been looking for a good link to imagery like this and
thank you for sharing it with us.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Maybe more than I ever wanted to know.
The shockwave addition image is attatched to one of my replies here. The
third image of 3. Four if you count Kens initial "nuke object".
Looking at some other pictures it becomes apparent almost any shape
could be used. A turbulent media in a sphere container would suffice. I
like Kens lathe shape best.
"B. Katt" wrote:
> > I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since> childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear> tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others> have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the> blast.> > If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and> such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive> at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html> > There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info> on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about> nukes but were afraid to ask. . .> > B. Katt> --> To reply via e-mail, please remove spamblock.> > > Disclaimer: nuking of any form is not necessarily endorsed by the maker> > of this image nor implied to be by the newsgroup proprietors. But you> > may want to check with the original creator and poster(s) as to their> > beliefs.> >> > How's that for legal mumbo-jumbo?> >> >> > --> > omniVERSE: beyond the universe> > http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm> > mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News