Maybe more than I ever wanted to know.
The shockwave addition image is attatched to one of my replies here. The
third image of 3. Four if you count Kens initial "nuke object".
Looking at some other pictures it becomes apparent almost any shape
could be used. A turbulent media in a sphere container would suffice. I
like Kens lathe shape best.


"B. Katt" wrote:
> 
> I like it since I've had perverse fascination with the bomb since
> childhood. It looks very much like some of the tactical nuclear
> tests done in Nevada in the 50's. My only criticism as others
> have pointed out is the lack of a ground shockwave from the
> blast.
> 
> If you are interested in the technical details of nuclear blasts and
> such you might want to check out the High Energy Weapons Archive
> at http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/index.html
> 
> There are lots of good pictures of bomb tests and tons of info
> on nuclear weapons effects. Everything you wanted to know about
> nukes but were afraid to ask. . .
> 
> B. Katt
> --
> To reply via e-mail, please remove spamblock.
> 
> > Disclaimer: nuking of any form is not necessarily endorsed by the maker
> > of this image nor implied to be by the newsgroup proprietors. But you
> > may want to check with the original creator and poster(s) as to their
> > beliefs.
> >
> > How's that for legal mumbo-jumbo?
> >
> >
> > --
> >  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> >   http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> >  mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message