 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
fine, I'll post the source(s) up soon
Graham Redway wrote:
>
> I'd give it a shot at rendering on a larger scale. It looks like memory
> might be the main concern. Take a look at the mem usage and if you'd
> think it'd be quicker on a PII 233 192Mb then I'll do it.
>
> Graham.
>
> Lewis wrote:
> >
> > If there is anyone willing to render this on a large scale, reply to
> > this thread or the one in povray.general.
> >
> > It doesn't look so good in this resolution, tho (more information in
> > povray.general)
> >
> > Now that I look at it it's more like a tree.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The BUSH
A LOT can be improved. Suggestions? (Grass?)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'forest.jpg' (156 KB)
Preview of image 'forest.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lewis wrote:
>
> The BUSH
> A LOT can be improved. Suggestions? (Grass?)
It has character. One thing that kind of sticks out is the leaf size vs.
the small branch diameter. If the bush had been recently pruned and the
leaves we see are all new growth then the thickness and abrupt end of the
brances could be explained. If this is a wild, unattended growth, there is
definatly something wrong with this picture. The leafs attached to the
trunk of the bush look out of place as well. If at all possible you
should add the leaves at one greater recursion level than the one they
are appearing on now.
Grass and roots that enter the ground a bit lower.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice start... looking forward to future revisions.
The stem of each leaf protrudes through the branch
it is attached to. Each leaf needs to be translated
away from its corresponding branch by almost the
length of this stem.
Lewis <ble### [at] netvision netil> wrote in message
news:3719CD63.97293061@netvision.net.il...
> The BUSH
> A LOT can be improved. Suggestions? (Grass?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The problem is that it took 10 hours to render
Ken wrote:
>
> Lewis wrote:
> >
> > The BUSH
> > A LOT can be improved. Suggestions? (Grass?)
>
> It has character. One thing that kind of sticks out is the leaf size vs.
> the small branch diameter. If the bush had been recently pruned and the
> leaves we see are all new growth then the thickness and abrupt end of the
> brances could be explained. If this is a wild, unattended growth, there is
> definatly something wrong with this picture. The leafs attached to the
> trunk of the bush look out of place as well. If at all possible you
> should add the leaves at one greater recursion level than the one they
> are appearing on now.
>
> Grass and roots that enter the ground a bit lower.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lewis,
Is it me, or is every branch the same?
Graham.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>The problem is that it took 10 hours to render
This is the nature of the beast it seems. Any time you step away from
simplistic scenes and try to approach realism (or even into technically
complex surrealism) your render times will skyrocket.
I don't think there is a real solution to this, unless it's the Bigger,
Faster, More approach to your processing engine(s).
Hey - even 'A Bugs' Life' took a thousand Silicon Graphics Workstations in a
network chugging away for months :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It could be you, but you may be right.
Graham Redway wrote:
>
> Lewis,
> Is it me, or is every branch the same?
>
> Graham.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>The problem is that it took 10 hours to render
How many recursion levels did you use? Did you exceed the 6 mark
and go to 7 ? I did a tree that took 9hrs. at a small render size
because
I made the mistake of going to 7, which Gilles warns against in the
extree.pov
files.
--
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Aargh, this is MY fault. I forgot to translate the leaf properly when it comes
to write the file. It's fixed now (download from
http://www.mediaport.net/Artichaud/Tran/sources/gtsrcee.htm).
Sorry
Gilles
Spock wrote:
> Nice start... looking forward to future revisions.
>
> The stem of each leaf protrudes through the branch
> it is attached to. Each leaf needs to be translated
> away from its corresponding branch by almost the
> length of this stem.
>
> Lewis <ble### [at] netvisionnetil> wrote in message
> news:3719CD63.97293061@netvision.net.il...
> > The BUSH
> > A LOT can be improved. Suggestions? (Grass?)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
