POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Baking powder, does it needs photon ?? Server Time
4 Oct 2024 07:11:04 EDT (-0400)
  Baking powder, does it needs photon ?? (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: Nicolas
Subject: Baking powder, does it needs photon ??
Date: 15 Apr 1999 03:41:05
Message: <37158a01.0@news.povray.org>
Do u guys think that this picture could really
benefit from the photon map patch ?

This is the modelisation of an experiment
to retrieve carbon dioxyde from a baking
powder's alcoholic fermentation.

-=Nicolas=-


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'scexp7.jpg' (151 KB)

Preview of image 'scexp7.jpg'
scexp7.jpg


 

From: GrimDude
Subject: Re: Baking powder, does it needs photon ??
Date: 15 Apr 1999 04:23:47
Message: <37159403.0@news.povray.org>
That's a really nice image! As bright as it is I'm not sure what photons
could do for you, but I'd throw them at it anyway! :)

GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Baking powder, does it needs photon ??
Date: 16 Apr 1999 01:41:47
Message: <3716BF6A.FD0C4DC5@aol.com>
This is great stuff. I indeed think it *could* help, especially if you
can get a mild sort of spectral dispersion in there, you know, by adding
a averaging color_map to the light along with the regular light color
syntax.
The liquid in the tank goes almost unnoticed, and knowing how fish tanks
split light this would be good to show it's existence better maybe. That
upside down "graduate" threw me a curve to begin with as it d/l'ed. The
flask contents don't appear to filter light at all, and I'm not so sure
about the photon mapping doing good rather than harm to the rest. I
haven't had much luck getting subtle caustics yet.


Nicolas wrote:
> 
> Do u guys think that this picture could really
> benefit from the photon map patch ?
> 
> This is the modelisation of an experiment
> to retrieve carbon dioxyde from a baking
> powder's alcoholic fermentation.
> 
> -=Nicolas=-
> 
>  [Image]

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: Baking powder, does it needs photon ??
Date: 16 Apr 1999 04:39:28
Message: <3716EA79.A9A78477@home.com>
Bob Hughes wrote:

> This is great stuff. I indeed think it *could* help, especially if you
> can get a mild sort of spectral dispersion in there, you know, by adding
> a averaging color_map to the light along with the regular light color
> syntax.
> The liquid in the tank goes almost unnoticed, and knowing how fish tanks
> split light this would be good to show it's existence better maybe. That
> upside down "graduate" threw me a curve to begin with as it d/l'ed. The
> flask contents don't appear to filter light at all, and I'm not so sure
> about the photon mapping doing good rather than harm to the rest. I
> haven't had much luck getting subtle caustics yet.

The caustics in my image (post: "My first real photon map image") are fairly
subtle although I don't know what caused this effect, I used an area light
and I've heard that UvPov has some problems with area lights so maybe that's
how the caustics got so subtle?

>
>
> Nicolas wrote:
> >
> > Do u guys think that this picture could really
> > benefit from the photon map patch ?
> >
> > This is the modelisation of an experiment
> > to retrieve carbon dioxyde from a baking
> > powder's alcoholic fermentation.
> >
> > -=Nicolas=-
> >
> >  [Image]
>
> --
>  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>   http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
>  mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Margus Ramst
Subject: Re: Baking powder, does it needs photon ??
Date: 16 Apr 1999 16:57:08
Message: <37179614.0@news.povray.org>
Thomas Lake wrote in message <3716EA79.A9A78477@home.com>...
>
>The caustics in my image (post: "My first real photon map image") are
fairly
>subtle although I don't know what caused this effect, I used an area light
>and I've heard that UvPov has some problems with area lights so maybe
that's
>how the caustics got so subtle?
>


I think UVPOV simply treats the area_light as a point light. So this
shouldn't be the problem. But you could simply test this by using a point
light. Have you tried it?
Of course, caustics is (esp. those of a seal ;) are a bit difficult to
predict. Maybe the majority of the light is concentrated somewhere out of
the camera's view.

Margus


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.