First of all, I'm really Noam Lewis (you probably recognize it by now)
but I'm posting under Lewis since my brother changed the name to his
when he saw Noam. Any messages under the name Eran Lewis or Basil Lewis
were really posted by me. And so from now on I'll go under the name
Lewis......(Oh, the joy of having to share a computer with 5 people.....
;))

blabla bla.....Anyway:

I just got the gilles famous tree macro, and the first thing I did was a
stereopovograph.
For those interested, the stereo viewer mention, i would suggest
calling: stereopovscope for the sake of having a cool long name that I
love (and has POV inside too)

This picture is especially nice when printed.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'tree3d.jpg' (26 KB)

Preview of image 'tree3d.jpg'

Hate to tell you this (again?) but the depth of field is too great for
this particular object. You have here a bonsai tree (those subminiature
bits of vegatation loved by all and bonsai hobbyists most) with your
face up close to it. I might be exaggerating but do me and yourself a
favor and look at a tree somewhere (not a houseplant) and close one eye
then the other taking note of how much shift there is in the limbs. It
should be only just noticeable, say a few inches at the distance of the
tree if it's about 50 feet away. Well in reality it's always about 2 and
a half inches because of your eye separation :)
However the larger and further the subject object is the less apparent
this is obviously making things get pretty flat after several hundred
feet. Of course I'm just pointing out the basic thing about stereopair
images and I'm no authority either, far from it. Your tree 3D render is
still like the photographs I've taken albeit the foreground of much
larger structures or landscapes. The tree being the subject matter
though  could certainly fair better with less left/right shift. As is it
is very much like looking at a bonsai tree on a desktop.
Please don't think I'm forcing my way on you okay? Like I say I only do
this already in reality and 3D modeling and amatuerishly as can be. Just
hoping to point out some things to you and others who may be wondering
of this sort of thing.


Lewis wrote:
> 
> First of all, I'm really Noam Lewis (you probably recognize it by now)
> but I'm posting under Lewis since my brother changed the name to his
> when he saw Noam. Any messages under the name Eran Lewis or Basil Lewis
> were really posted by me. And so from now on I'll go under the name
> Lewis......(Oh, the joy of having to share a computer with 5 people.....
> ;))
> 
> blabla bla.....Anyway:
> 
> I just got the gilles famous tree macro, and the first thing I did was a
> stereopovograph.
> For those interested, the stereo viewer mention, i would suggest
> calling: stereopovscope for the sake of having a cool long name that I
> love (and has POV inside too)
> 
> This picture is especially nice when printed.
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> Hate to tell you this (again?) but the depth of field is too great for
...
> I might be exaggerating but do me and yourself a favor...
...
> Of course I'm just pointing out the basic thing about stereopair
> images and I'm no authority either, far from it.
> Please don't think I'm forcing my way on you okay? Like I say I only do
> this already in reality and 3D modeling and amatuerishly as can be. Just
> hoping to point out some things to you and others who may be wondering
> of this sort of thing.

Hey! Cool down! I'm not offended! In fact I'm glad that somebody out
there actually *cares*.
As for you comments, I forgot to mention: you must view this image from
at least 1 meter away (3 feet) otherwise you get the "in-your-face"
effect.

Oh, and thanks, anyway...

Post a reply to this message

How am I supposed to look at it? Cross-eyed?
It's too far apart for looking at it wall-eyed and I'm
not able to focus cross-eyed....

Markus

Lewis wrote:
> 
> First of all, I'm really Noam Lewis (you probably recognize it by now)
> but I'm posting under Lewis since my brother changed the name to his
> when he saw Noam. Any messages under the name Eran Lewis or Basil Lewis
> were really posted by me. And so from now on I'll go under the name
> Lewis......(Oh, the joy of having to share a computer with 5 people.....
> ;))
> 
> blabla bla.....Anyway:
> 
> I just got the gilles famous tree macro, and the first thing I did was a
> stereopovograph.
> For those interested, the stereo viewer mention, i would suggest
> calling: stereopovscope for the sake of having a cool long name that I
> love (and has POV inside too)
> 
> This picture is especially nice when printed.
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

-- 

 Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens

Post a reply to this message

Ah, another person *does* exist that can't "focus" while cross-eyed.
You'd think this is easy since it's mentioned a lot for doing these sort
of things. I can keep focus no matter what "wall-eyed" (never understood
this term).
I have a simple method, requiring no instruments, for seeing this sort
of image; explained with small illustration at my 3D viewing web page:

 http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/3D.htm  (zero in origin, capital "D")


Markus Becker wrote:
> 
> How am I supposed to look at it? Cross-eyed?
> It's too far apart for looking at it wall-eyed and I'm
> not able to focus cross-eyed....
> 
> Markus
> 
> Lewis wrote:
> >
> > First of all, I'm really Noam Lewis (you probably recognize it by now)
> > but I'm posting under Lewis since my brother changed the name to his
> > when he saw Noam. Any messages under the name Eran Lewis or Basil Lewis
> > were really posted by me. And so from now on I'll go under the name
> > Lewis......(Oh, the joy of having to share a computer with 5 people.....
> > ;))
> >
> > blabla bla.....Anyway:
> >
> > I just got the gilles famous tree macro, and the first thing I did was a
> > stereopovograph.
> > For those interested, the stereo viewer mention, i would suggest
> > calling: stereopovscope for the sake of having a cool long name that I
> > love (and has POV inside too)
> >
> > This picture is especially nice when printed.
> >
> >   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  [Image]
> 
> --

>  Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message

Sorry, I get defensive ahead of any potential offense way too much I
guess.
Didn't I mention how neat the (bonsai, hee-hee) tree looked? Well
consider it said now.


Lewis wrote:
> 
> Hey! Cool down! I'm not offended! In fact I'm glad that somebody out
> there actually *cares*.
> As for you comments, I forgot to mention: you must view this image from
> at least 1 meter away (3 feet) otherwise you get the "in-your-face"
> effect.
> 
> Oh, and thanks, anyway...

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message