Greetings group,

	Well a while back someone posted an image with the subject ehading, a
hill with a cool sky, well this is my verison of that. Anyway, Im
beginning to learn media, though I still find it a little unpredictable
at times. This image looks best with a black background, not a white
one, it is actually being desinged for a desktop and I might take it to
kinko's and have them do a high quality printing, I don't know.

	I want to work ont eh texture for the mountain, but im not sure what I
want to do, I just know that it looks wrong. Any suggestions??

Paul

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'new_sky.jpg' (33 KB)

Preview of image 'new_sky.jpg'

I have a shot of Golgotha (or what people today accept as Golgotha). It is a
tiny hill, with a stony surface that can be perceived as describing a human
skull. There's not much chance of me getting it scanned for you, but perhaps
you can find an image of it on the web.

Anyway, what you have so far is coming along! I would like to see lightning,
rain, and of course the hill.

GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet

Post a reply to this message

Hmmm, thats an idea, I thnk that I may search for Golgotha. I do like to
be accurate. Thanks for the input.

Do you know the best way to go about making lightning. I have seen
several discussions, and if i remeber correctly it came back to media

Paul

GrimDude wrote:
> 
> I have a shot of Golgotha (or what people today accept as Golgotha). It is a
> tiny hill, with a stony surface that can be perceived as describing a human
> skull. There's not much chance of me getting it scanned for you, but perhaps
> you can find an image of it on the web.
> 
> Anyway, what you have so far is coming along! I would like to see lightning,
> rain, and of course the hill.
> 
> GrimDude
> vos### [at] arkansasnet

Post a reply to this message

That sky looks like it has a media infection alright j/k.
Did you use 'scattering'? Looks it to me. Try *not* using that and go
with a couple of medias in one interior. One 'emission', one
'absorption' offset and/or scaled a bit differently. You could maybe get
by with just the emission, much faster too.
I have a lightning include file I've modified (and for P-R 3.1) from an
original (3.0* circa 4/98) by J. Brickley, though I haven't heard
anything from him yet about re-distributing the include. I think it
would be okay since I left his comment header in, so I'll email it over
to you. It's not finished really, very crude still which is why I
hesitate to upload it anywhere as well.


Paul Swagerty wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, thats an idea, I thnk that I may search for Golgotha. I do like to
> be accurate. Thanks for the input.
> 
> Do you know the best way to go about making lightning. I have seen
> several discussions, and if i remeber correctly it came back to media
> 
> Paul
> 
> GrimDude wrote:
> >
> > I have a shot of Golgotha (or what people today accept as Golgotha). It is a
> > tiny hill, with a stony surface that can be perceived as describing a human
> > skull. There's not much chance of me getting it scanned for you, but perhaps
> > you can find an image of it on the web.
> >
> > Anyway, what you have so far is coming along! I would like to see lightning,
> > rain, and of course the hill.
> >
> > GrimDude
> > vos### [at] arkansasnet

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message