That sky looks like it has a media infection alright j/k.
Did you use 'scattering'? Looks it to me. Try *not* using that and go
with a couple of medias in one interior. One 'emission', one
'absorption' offset and/or scaled a bit differently. You could maybe get
by with just the emission, much faster too.
I have a lightning include file I've modified (and for P-R 3.1) from an
original (3.0* circa 4/98) by J. Brickley, though I haven't heard
anything from him yet about re-distributing the include. I think it
would be okay since I left his comment header in, so I'll email it over
to you. It's not finished really, very crude still which is why I
hesitate to upload it anywhere as well.


Paul Swagerty wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, thats an idea, I thnk that I may search for Golgotha. I do like to
> be accurate. Thanks for the input.
> 
> Do you know the best way to go about making lightning. I have seen
> several discussions, and if i remeber correctly it came back to media
> 
> Paul
> 
> GrimDude wrote:
> >
> > I have a shot of Golgotha (or what people today accept as Golgotha). It is a
> > tiny hill, with a stony surface that can be perceived as describing a human
> > skull. There's not much chance of me getting it scanned for you, but perhaps
> > you can find an image of it on the web.
> >
> > Anyway, what you have so far is coming along! I would like to see lightning,
> > rain, and of course the hill.
> >
> > GrimDude
> > vos### [at] arkansasnet

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message