 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
2 of my trials with the amazing photon-map patch...
-the first one combines refraction and reflection in
a recursive manner
-the second one is a lava lamp, with refraction in the middle
and reflection on the base...
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'base.jpg' (42 KB)
Download 'lava.jpg' (47 KB)
Preview of image 'base.jpg'
Preview of image 'lava.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Fabien Mosen <101### [at] compuserve com> schrieb in Nachricht
<36665A7F.73A34C5D@compuserve.com>...
>2 of my trials with the amazing photon-map patch...
>-the first one combines refraction and reflection in
>a recursive manner
>-the second one is a lava lamp, with refraction in the middle
>and reflection on the base...
Because of your system date and the title, MSOE now put it in front of
Govert Zoethout's post with the same subject. Is this newsreader really that
stupid? It should sort on the entire header information, not on the subject
alone.
--
Rudy Velthuis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe so. Netscape Communicator is listing this fine for me; that is, as
by date and time, yet still it isn't in another thread or out of order.
I'm as bewildered as can be that the Date and Time could be 12/3/1998
3:31 AM and still show up correctly in the topic list, it's after
=Box-Work in progress=Sat 9:23PM and before =Bug with Blobs?=Sun 4:47AM.
Now I wish you hadn't pointed it out to me, I'm confused (or lucky).
Btw, you meant MSIE I'm sure, not MSOE :)
Rudy Velthuis wrote:
>
> Because of your system date and the title, MSOE now put it in front of
> Govert Zoethout's post with the same subject. Is this newsreader really that
> stupid? It should sort on the entire header information, not on the subject
> alone.
>
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?PoV
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote in message <36EBCD86.A7C44BF5@aol.com>...
>Btw, you meant MSIE I'm sure, not MSOE :)
MSOE - MicroSoft Outlook Express
And I wouldn't have noticed the post if Rudy hadn't commented on it :(
Checking it out now...
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes schrieb in Nachricht <36EBCD86.A7C44BF5@aol.com>...
>Maybe so. Netscape Communicator is listing this fine for me; that is, as
>by date and time, yet still it isn't in another thread or out of order.
>I'm as bewildered as can be that the Date and Time could be 12/3/1998
>3:31 AM and still show up correctly in the topic list, it's after
>=Box-Work in progress=Sat 9:23PM and before =Bug with Blobs?=Sun 4:47AM.
>Now I wish you hadn't pointed it out to me, I'm confused (or lucky).
>Btw, you meant MSIE I'm sure, not MSOE :)
I meant MSOE allright: MS Outlook Express, the news/mail reader belonging to
MS Internet Explorer. Your sorting is right. MSOE should sort it into a new
thread, but at the position you mentioned, but doesn't do this. In the
header, there should be an XRef and a References line if it is a follow up
to another post. Fabien's post doesn't have one, so it should be in a new
thread. This post and your post should have them though.
I normally neither use Netscape nor Outlook Express, but Gravity, a real
newsreader. But it doesn't handle html or pictures very easily (it can only
decode them to disk and them view them from there), so for the povray groups
I use MSOE.
--
Rudy Velthuis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've got my current view (in MSOE) set for unread messages. That way I see
the messages whether they have the same subject, or not.
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If you increase the jitter, it should get rid of the artifacts in the first
image (I'll have a larger default jitter in the next release). Set it to at
least 0.4 (maybe 0.8 even).
-Nathan
Fabien Mosen wrote:
>
> 2 of my trials with the amazing photon-map patch...
> -the first one combines refraction and reflection in
> a recursive manner
> -the second one is a lava lamp, with refraction in the middle
> and reflection on the base...
>
> Fabien.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image] [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, and use a larger search radius for the first image, too (larger
relative to the shooting density)!
-Nathan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ah yes, that's what I have set too. Outlook Express huh, sorry for the
mistake. Shows how much I've drifted from IE.
GrimDude wrote:
>
> I've got my current view (in MSOE) set for unread messages. That way I see
> the messages whether they have the same subject, or not.
>
> GrimDude
> vos### [at] arkansasnet
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?PoV
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How long did this image take to render? Very nice. Is there a megapatch
available somewhere that contains this as well as the isosurface patch.
There was also one a year ago or so that did texture maps based on slope.
Jon
====================================================
Jon & Frances Berndt
email: jsb### [at] hal-pcorg, fan### [at] hal-pcorg
WWW: http://www.hal-pc.org/~jsb
League City, TX
====================================================
Fabien Mosen <101### [at] compuservecom> wrote in message
<36665A7F.73A34C5D@compuserve.com>...
>2 of my trials with the amazing photon-map patch...
>-the first one combines refraction and reflection in
>a recursive manner
>-the second one is a lava lamp, with refraction in the middle
>and reflection on the base...
>
>Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
