And how many people celebrate the last of april ??


//Spider

Ken wrote:
> 
> Graham Redway wrote:
> >
> > >>I'll be waiting... But, why the 5th ???
> >
> > I think this may be an English thing. All stemmed from a plot hundreds
> > of years ago to burn down the houses of parliment and kill the king. I
> > forget now. On the 5th Nov. is fireworks night, when we build huge
> > bonfires and put 'Guys' on top of them. These 'Guys', as in Guy Fawkes
> > are meant to be a representation of the bloke who's 'evil' plan it was.
> >
> >         Graham.
> 
> I suppose the English don't put much stock in the American
> independance day celebration do they ? Nope suppose not.
> The Chinese people use kilo tons of explosives each year to
> celebrate the new year and the Mexican people use them for
> their own Cinco de Mayo celebrations. Do the French use
> fireworks on Bastille day ? I've seen several photos of
> fireworks with the Eiffel Tower in the picture.
> 
> --
> Ken Tyler
> 
> tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message

Yeah, antialiasing would be greatly improved upon if it could be limited
to specified, or excluded from certain parts of a scene.
The amount of depth, +R3 default, matters a great deal as many already
know. More improves singular point "seeing", yet less depth allows for
less smudging.
Any votes for selective antialiasing? Or has this vote been balloted
before...?

Ken wrote:
> 
> The anti aliasing
> really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> star fields. Anybody else notice this ?
> 
> --
> Ken Tyler
> 
> tyl### [at] pacbellnet

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob

Post a reply to this message

This right? he's a she? Or just another typo, Ms. Spider?


Spider wrote:
> 
> >  for Spider. That is if he even wants it.
> Yes, her really wants it..
>
> //Spider

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob

Post a reply to this message

Actually, I am a male and it was a typo.
:-)
(I don't have THAT bad grammar, but almost.)

//Spider

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> This right? he's a she? Or just another typo, Ms. Spider?
> 
> Spider wrote:
> >
> > >  for Spider. That is if he even wants it.
> > Yes, her really wants it..
> >
> > //Spider
> 
> --
>  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>   http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> =Bob

Post a reply to this message

A new keyword to an object , antialias off, or no_antialias would fit
nice.

//Spider

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> Yeah, antialiasing would be greatly improved upon if it could be limited
> to specified, or excluded from certain parts of a scene.
> The amount of depth, +R3 default, matters a great deal as many already
> know. More improves singular point "seeing", yet less depth allows for
> less smudging.
> Any votes for selective antialiasing? Or has this vote been balloted
> before...?
> 
> Ken wrote:
> >
> > The anti aliasing
> > really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> > firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> > to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> > star fields. Anybody else notice this ?
> >
> > --
> > Ken Tyler
> >
> > tyl### [at] pacbellnet
> 
> --
>  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>   http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> =Bob

Post a reply to this message

Please accept my humble apologies :)


Spider wrote:
> 
> Actually, I am a male and it was a typo.
> :-)
> (I don't have THAT bad grammar, but almost.)
> 
> //Spider
> 
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > This right? he's a she? Or just another typo, Ms. Spider?
> >
> > Spider wrote:
> > >
> > > >  for Spider. That is if he even wants it.
> > > Yes, her really wants it..
> > >
> > > //Spider
> >
> > --
> >  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> >   http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> > =Bob

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob

Post a reply to this message

Spider schrieb in Nachricht <36B3BE2E.DAFFDF44@bahnhof.se>...
>And how many people celebrate the last of april ??
>
Approx. 15 millions of them (this is Queen's Day in Holland).

Yes, I know... but a late reply is better than no reply.
-- 
Rudy Velthuis

Post a reply to this message

hehe, Add sweden then... Very big feast here.
//Spider

Rudy Velthuis wrote:
> 
> Spider schrieb in Nachricht <36B3BE2E.DAFFDF44@bahnhof.se>...
> >And how many people celebrate the last of april ??
> >
> Approx. 15 millions of them (this is Queen's Day in Holland).
> 
> Yes, I know... but a late reply is better than no reply.
> --
> Rudy Velthuis

Post a reply to this message

Or maybe set it to antialias everywhere but the edges (good for images with
transparency)
"Spider" <spi### [at] bahnhofse> wrote in message
news:36B48305.821EA69E@bahnhof.se...
> A new keyword to an object , antialias off, or no_antialias would fit
> nice.
>
> //Spider
>
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, antialiasing would be greatly improved upon if it could be limited
> > to specified, or excluded from certain parts of a scene.
> > The amount of depth, +R3 default, matters a great deal as many already
> > know. More improves singular point "seeing", yet less depth allows for
> > less smudging.
> > Any votes for selective antialiasing? Or has this vote been balloted
> > before...?
> >
> > Ken wrote:
> > >
> > > The anti aliasing
> > > really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> > > firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> > > to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> > > star fields. Anybody else notice this ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ken Tyler
> > >
> > > tyl### [at] pacbellnet
> >
> > --
> >  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> >   http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
> > =Bob

Post a reply to this message

Mahalis wrote:
>
> > > > The anti aliasing
> > > > really threw me for a loop. It wiped out a lot of the reflected
> > > > firework light on the water. Had to add some cheater light sources
> > > > to get the reflected colors seen in this image. AA also wipes out
> > > > star fields.

This was three years ago but as we now know this is because colors
are clipped before aa and also DOF calculations. They don't need to
be clipped. 100% is not the maximum incoming light intensity in the
virtual povray camera. The 100% limit is only in the virtual film
which records the incoming light.


_________________________________
Kari Kivisalo - http://LuxLab.com

Post a reply to this message