 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
a jpg would have worked just as well as a zipped bmp - or a gif even
very nice all the same - maybe add a coloured light?
Rick
"Saadat Saeed" <saa### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message
news:01bf9305$c5c4ecc0$1e00a8c0@bharebahwsasa...
> Bored on Eid I decided to render my wife's perfume bottle.....
>
> Hope I get good comments.... as I am still amateurish at this!
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp was a
little more in size with without any loss in quality!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very beautiful but too much downloading and un coding for me... Still
beautiful work... What are faked caustics...?
Saadat Saeed wrote:
> Bored on Eid I decided to render my wife's perfume bottle.....
>
> Hope I get good comments.... as I am still amateurish at this!
>
> Name: pbottle.zip
> pbottle.zip Type: application/zip (application/zip)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21 Mar 2000 10:35:28 -0500, "Saadat Saeed"
<nat### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp was a
>little more in size with without any loss in quality!
(Just out of curiousity, did you try a grayscale jpeg or 8-bit png?)
I like it, it has a certain raytracing spirit to it.
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It was neither.... I rendered it in full color........ and with the white
light, the silver baseplane and the crystallic look of the bottle it came
out greyscale!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If you read the manual with the POVRAY 3.1e its is there in the
INTERIOR.... the manual can explain it better than I can!
Moon47 <rdm### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in article
<38D681A5.2869BCD2@earthlink.net>...
> Very beautiful but too much downloading and un coding for me... Still
> beautiful work... What are faked caustics...?
>
> Saadat Saeed wrote:
>
> > Bored on Eid I decided to render my wife's perfume bottle.....
> >
> > Hope I get good comments.... as I am still amateurish at this!
> >
> > Name: pbottle.zip
> > pbottle.zip Type: application/zip (application/zip)
> > Encoding: x-uuencode
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saadat Saeed wrote:
>
> Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp was a
> little more in size with without any loss in quality!
Except that I can't see bmps here...
Jerome
--
* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Okay okay... I didn't have a converter on hand.... forgive me for posting
in bmp!!!!!
Jerome <ber### [at] inamecom> wrote in article
<38D8B8FB.57F54268@iname.com>...
> Saadat Saeed wrote:
> >
> > Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp
was a
> > little more in size with without any loss in quality!
> Except that I can't see bmps here...
>
> Jerome
> --
> * Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
> * to Hyde... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
> *******************************
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saadat Saeed wrote:
>
> Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp was a
> little more in size with without any loss in quality!
The .zip file was 68 kB. Sure that isn't really big. But I just saved
the
bmp file with standard settings (75% quality, no smoothing) from xv, and
the jpg was only 7.8 kB! That's quite a lot smaller, and I can't see any
difference between the bmp and the jpg.
I don't know what you did, of course; but I often see jpgs which have
been
created with a quality setting close to 100%. This makes the image a lot
larger but adds very little in quality for most images.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Think of it as evolution in action
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR |
| | | hjp### [at] wsracat | -- Tony Rand in "Oath of Fealty"
__/ | http://wsrx.wsr.ac.at/~hjp/ | by Niven & Pournelle
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <38D95533.E53482F6@hjp.at>, "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp### [at] hjpat>
wrote:
> The .zip file was 68 kB. Sure that isn't really big. But I just saved
> the bmp file with standard settings (75% quality, no smoothing) from
> xv, and the jpg was only 7.8 kB! That's quite a lot smaller, and I
> can't see any difference between the bmp and the jpg.
And another thing-many readers can display GIF, JPEG, or PNG images by
themselves, but I had to open a separate program, extract the file, and
open yet another program to view the file. It is much easier to just
scroll down. :-)
> I don't know what you did, of course; but I often see jpgs which have
> been created with a quality setting close to 100%. This makes the
> image a lot larger but adds very little in quality for most images.
I usually use around 60-70% quality, I adjust it to fit the image. I
have gone down to 45%, but only once. But the software being used to
compress the file does matter.
And I only use JPEG for web images and newsgroup posts, I prefer to use
PNG, PICT, or TGA. I really dislike those compression artifacts.
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
