|
|
Saadat Saeed wrote:
>
> Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp was a
> little more in size with without any loss in quality!
The .zip file was 68 kB. Sure that isn't really big. But I just saved
the
bmp file with standard settings (75% quality, no smoothing) from xv, and
the jpg was only 7.8 kB! That's quite a lot smaller, and I can't see any
difference between the bmp and the jpg.
I don't know what you did, of course; but I often see jpgs which have
been
created with a quality setting close to 100%. This makes the image a lot
larger but adds very little in quality for most images.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Think of it as evolution in action
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR |
| | | hjp### [at] wsracat | -- Tony Rand in "Oath of Fealty"
__/ | http://wsrx.wsr.ac.at/~hjp/ | by Niven & Pournelle
Post a reply to this message
|
|