Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go to
the link below.
http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
Steve Shelby

Post a reply to this message

This is grooovy baby!

A. Powers.


news:4057052e@news.povray.org...
> Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go to
> the link below.
> http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
> I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
> Steve Shelby

Post a reply to this message

"Fernando G. del Cueto" <fcu### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:40575309$1@news.povray.org...
> This is grooovy baby!
>
> A. Powers.
>

> news:4057052e@news.povray.org...
> > Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go
to
> > the link below.
> > http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
> > I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
> > Steve Shelby



I think you've just come up with a new official slogan for the POV-Ray site
:-)

-- 
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message

That's cool!

Could you post the source? I want to render a super-smooth hi-res version to run
full screen :)

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com


"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:4057052e@news.povray.org...
> Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go to
> the link below.
> http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
> I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
> Steve Shelby
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no loss from
the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a still?
A little explanation is required here. This anim is one I made a couple
years ago, using Moray 3.3 and POVray 3.1. the animation is from Moray's
plugin, so if you run it from POVray, you'll have to set up the clock
yourself. The cone rotates on it's axis 360 degrees in 120 frames, with last
frame skipped for smooth looping. It has to be rendered with POVray 3.1. If
you use 3.5 you'll get something completely different. Also, if you use
Moray, it has to be version 3.3.
Let me know how it works out.
Steve Shelby

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:4057f67d$1@news.povray.org...
> That's cool!
>
> Could you post the source? I want to render a super-smooth hi-res version
to run
> full screen :)
>
> -- 
> Tek
> www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
>
> "Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
> news:4057052e@news.povray.org...
> > Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go
to
> > the link below.
> > http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
> > I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
> > Steve Shelby
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'cone2.zip' (4 KB)

Which words are you referring to?
Steve Shelby

"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:4057974e$1@news.povray.org...
> "Fernando G. del Cueto" <fcu### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> news:40575309$1@news.povray.org...
> > This is grooovy baby!
> >
> > A. Powers.
> >

> > news:4057052e@news.povray.org...
> > > Compressing this small enough to post here didn't do it justice, so go
> to
> > > the link below.
> > > http://www.shelbyvision.com/Psychedellic.htm
> > > I think it's worth the wait, but I can't guarantee you will. ;^}>
> > > Steve Shelby
>
>
>
> I think you've just come up with a new official slogan for the POV-Ray
site
> :-)
>
> -- 
> - Respectfully,
> Dan
> http://<broken link>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:40583e74$1@news.povray.org...
> Which words are you referring to?
> Steve Shelby

Why, "Who needs drugs when we have POV-Ray," of course :-)

-- 
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message

> Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no loss from
> the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a still?

Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth, so I
intend to render it with more frames.

I'll let you know how it goes. :)

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com

Post a reply to this message

I've not had any luck with it. I can't make it look quite like the animation
even using pov 3.1, there must be some settings moray does implicitly that I
don't have. Plus there's not actually any animation data in the file, nothing is
using the clock variable.

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:40592bc4$1@news.povray.org...
> > Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no loss from
> > the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a still?
>
> Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth, so I
> intend to render it with more frames.
>
> I'll let you know how it goes. :)
>
> -- 
> Tek
> www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
>

Post a reply to this message

I opened the same .pov file I sent you and rendered it in pov3.1, and the
the image looks like the attached file. I did not even have Moray open. Does
your render look different from that?
About the clock, Moray's animation plugin produces an .avi directly, without
any clock values being set in POVray. So if you want to animate the scene in
POVray without using Moray, you have to set it up there yourself. My
animation was 8 seconds long and 15 frames per second (119 frames after
skipping the last one for smooth looping). You simply have to make the cone
rotate (around the z axis) 360 degrees in the time specified.
Steve Shelby

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:40593ac2$1@news.povray.org...
> I've not had any luck with it. I can't make it look quite like the
animation
> even using pov 3.1, there must be some settings moray does implicitly that
I
> don't have. Plus there's not actually any animation data in the file,
nothing is
> using the clock variable.
>
> -- 
> Tek
> www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> news:40592bc4$1@news.povray.org...
> > > Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no
loss from
> > > the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a
still?
> >
> > Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth,
so I
> > intend to render it with more frames.
> >
> > I'll let you know how it goes. :)
> >
> > -- 
> > Tek
> > www.evilsuperbrain.com
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'Copy of cone2.jpg' (37 KB)

Preview of image 'Copy of cone2.jpg'