 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" <run### [at] mobilixnet dk> wrote in message
news:3ca45c6d@news.povray.org...
> There are quite some possibilities that I want to try out with this new
> technique before I make it into an include file.
>
> Here's a test of simulated wind blowing in the grass. I think it looks
> interesting, and yet something's not quite right. Any ideas?
I think the areas of little gusts are too small.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As Bill said, the wind gusts cover too small areas, also, the
actual movement is quiet to fast and jerky IMHO.
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To me it looks like the grass is dancing. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It has the potential, but the problem is simple- the grass looks too
"constrained". Real grass would move more slowly and gracefully, and in wider
swaths. However, you have a great start on getting it to do what you want.
On reviewing it, the animation shows that the blades appear rigid and they
seem topivot from their bases. Actual grass blades bend in the middle. Is that
possible with your texture?
Cheers!
Chip Shults
My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias" wrote:
> As Bill said, the wind gusts cover too small areas,
> also, the actual movement is quiet to fast and jerky IMHO.
Thanks Bill and Tim, I'll try to fix that.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sir Charles W. Shults III" wrote:
> It has the potential, but the problem is simple-
> the grass looks too "constrained". Real grass would
> move more slowly and gracefully, and in wider swaths.
Thanks for the tip, I'll try to fix that.
> However, you have a great start on getting it to do
> what you want.
> On reviewing it, the animation shows that the
> blades appear rigid and they seem topivot from their
> bases. Actual grass blades bend in the middle. Is
> that possible with your texture?
*thinks for one second*
Yes! :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
> To me it looks like the grass is dancing. :)
Weeeeell - in one way I guess it is ... if you want to be poetic! ;)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
> it spoils the illusion
In what way?
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > it spoils the illusion
>
> In what way?
the movement just looks flatter than previous anims
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After watching it a few times over, it looks alot more like static
electricity making the hair on my arm move then grass blowing in the wind..
8-) I'd guess that it's becouse everything looks to be going the same way,
the same amount, all at once, without any sort of chaotic behavior..
*shrug.. That make sense?
"Rune" <run### [at] mobilixnetdk> wrote in message
news:3ca45c6d@news.povray.org...
> There are quite some possibilities that I want to try out with this new
> technique before I make it into an include file.
> Here's a test of simulated wind blowing in the grass. I think it looks
> interesting, and yet something's not quite right. Any ideas?
> (BTW, I'll work on improving the interaction with the two balls and their
> shadows later.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
