|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jörg 'Yadgar' Bleimann
Subject: A question about large animations...
Date: 5 Nov 2003 17:34:32
Message: <3FA98944.C2991504@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
High!
Does the famous-infamous ;-) 1 meg limit for animation files still
apply? If yes, what about establishing a separate binaries newsgroup for
people who are lucky enough to have DSL connections and/or wanting to
post large animations? I could imagine that many here would like to see
such a group...
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>High
Are you?
> Does the famous-infamous ;-) 1 meg limit for animation files still
> apply? If yes, what about establishing a separate binaries newsgroup for
> people who are lucky enough to have DSL connections and/or wanting to
> post large animations? I could imagine that many here would like to see
> such a group...
Why not just post a link... or develop a website for this? Its much faster
to download from websites than newsgroups as well as you don't have to worry
about attachment encoding wars... ;)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 3/11/03
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe a specialized POV version of bittorent (or a bittorent-like patch for
POV-ray)? After rendering an animation or image it's hashed and shared on
the p2p network automatically.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> High!
>
> Does the famous-infamous ;-) 1 meg limit for animation files still
> apply? If yes, what about establishing a separate binaries newsgroup fo
r
> people who are lucky enough to have DSL connections and/or wanting to
> post large animations? I could imagine that many here would like to see
> such a group...
It's not only a question of bandwidth but also of server space.
Remember that despite generosity of netplex running this server costs
money. I don't see any reason why you can't put your large animations
on a web server (either run by you, your ISP or a free webspace somewhere
).
Also note that a lot of people automatically download all postings on
this server regularly - people with dial-up connections as well as with
broadband access.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 25 Oct. 2003 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Apache wrote:
> After rendering an animation or image it's hashed and shared on
> the p2p network automatically.
Well... I could imagine that there are people who wouldn't like
such functionality. Additionally, I think that pov should be here
to render pics, and to do THAT job well.
Greets
Dave
--
Dave "tPassive" Vogt| ruby -e "n=gets.to_i;a=(2..n).to_a;a.each{
Linux user #225040| |x|puts x;(x*2).step(n,x){|j|a.delete j}}"
____________________|_____________________________ |
PGP Key: http://control-alt-del.ch/public_key.asc \____________/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I understand that. But it was a nice piece of fantasy!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Does the famous-infamous ;-) 1 meg limit for animation files still
> apply? If yes, what about establishing a separate binaries newsgroup for
> people who are lucky enough to have DSL connections and/or wanting to
> post large animations? I could imagine that many here would like to see
> such a group...
Nice idea...
...however... the problem is that might mean that all the really cool
animations get put on povray.big-binarys.animations, and nothing gets put on
povray.binaries.animations any more... would be a shame if animations become
purely the presurve of people with fast net connections... :-(
I agree though, it's tough trying to make stuff fit... especially since the
NNTP protocol seems to mandate ASCII-encoding all bianry attachments... I've
discovered that MPEG can be made to fit, but only with insane bitrates...
50k/sec, anyone? +^S
[This is where someone posts a message saying "what we really need is some
super-fantastic new codec that can compress anything into the size of a
peanut"... If only it were that simple! ;-)]
Thanks.
Andrew
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |