 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
MJL
Skip Talbot wrote:
> Sweet deal! How about with radiosity and a high ambient on those cylinders?
> A setup like this with a story/concept behind it would have made a great
> entry in the overly complicated machines IRTC round. Looking forward to the
> updated version.
>
> Skip
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
POV-Physics 6.5.9.6 - Fake laser beams will cast shadows unless created with
no_shadow sources... doh. Thanks to everyone who pointed that out.
Here is an update, no shadows, slightly higher resolution.
MJL
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'laser3.mpg' (279 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I saved it. :o) It's better, but still doesn't really look like 'light'..
But how did you calculate the position of the mirrors?
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
No. Light will not block the passage of light.
Cheers!
Chip Shults
My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neat animation. Did you use two trace statements to get the beam to
bounce off the mirrors and stop at the more diffuse objects?
I've got a couple suggestions, since the beam is a little hard to see:
-dim the lights in the room
-give the cylinders an emitting media with a cylindrical density. The
density pattern can be rotated using the Reorient_Trans macro, I think.
Now if you're a real glutton for punishment, you can introduce convex
mirrors and substitute some of the cylinders for cones :)
Mark James Lewin wrote:
> POV-Physics 6.5.9.6 - Fake laser beams will cast shadows unless created
> with no_shadow sources... doh. Thanks to everyone who pointed that out.
>
> Here is an update, no shadows, slightly higher resolution.
>
> MJL
--
Samuel Benge
sbe### [at] caltel com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hugo wrote:
> I saved it. :o) It's better, but still doesn't really look like 'light'..
I know :-( This was meant to be a quick experiment, but maybe I'll try to improve
the laser beam.
> But how did you calculate the position of the mirrors?
Most were easy (90 degree deflections). The others used simple trig.
MJL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Samuel Benge wrote:
> Neat animation. Did you use two trace statements to get the beam to
> bounce off the mirrors and stop at the more diffuse objects?
Yes, pretty much.
>
> I've got a couple suggestions, since the beam is a little hard to see:
> -dim the lights in the room
> -give the cylinders an emitting media with a cylindrical density. The
> density pattern can be rotated using the Reorient_Trans macro, I think.
I thought of doing that, but this was meant to be just an hour or so of
entertainment. I'll see if it improves things though.
>
> Now if you're a real glutton for punishment, you can introduce convex
> mirrors and substitute some of the cylinders for cones :)
Ha! If you do this, you may as well shoot photons and ditch the cylinders
altogether. You could use lenses then too.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Cool. Isn't it supposed to explode at the end?
or is that just all the more S for your ER?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:06:55 +1000, Mark James Lewin
<m_j### [at] yahoocomau> wrote:
>POV-Physics 6.5.9.6 - Fake laser beams will cast shadows unless created with
>no_shadow sources... doh. Thanks to everyone who pointed that out.
>
>Here is an update, no shadows, slightly higher resolution.
Looks good -- although it seems to me like the laserbeam is hitting the
little mirror on the center left for quite a while without a reflected beam
--
Marc van den Dikkenberg
--
The PowerBasic Archives -- http://www.xlsior.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:40:17 -0400, "Greg M. Johnson"
<gregj:-)565### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>Cool. Isn't it supposed to explode at the end?
>or is that just all the more S for your ER?
It it would be powerful to explode something at the end, it wouldn't be a
very smart idea to reflect it straight back at the laser emitter, like it
does at the very beginning of the animation. :-)
--
Marc van den Dikkenberg
--
The PowerBasic Archives -- http://www.xlsior.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
