POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Flutter dear butterfly... [test] Server Time
4 Nov 2024 19:20:31 EST (-0500)
  Flutter dear butterfly... [test] (Message 1 to 10 of 14)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>
From: Dearmad
Subject: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 5 May 2001 16:24:07
Message: <3AF462E1.F7CF3B71@qwest.net>
Just testing to see if my ISP is functioning
properly... working on butterflies at the moment
so I thought I'd post...
-- 
Obscure homebrewed graphics utilities and some
pictures:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'first.mpg' (292 KB)

From: Sander
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 5 May 2001 16:55:15
Message: <MPG.155e8743e207396498975e@NEWS.POVRAY.ORG>
In article <3AF462E1.F7CF3B71@qwest.net>, Dearmad says...
> Just testing to see if my ISP is functioning
> properly... working on butterflies at the moment
> so I thought I'd post...
> 
I can't play it (W2k MediaPlayer 7.0 or Xing Player 3.30); It ran well 
in MainActor's VideoEditor... What did you use to animate and what type 
of image were they?

There should be more images to make a smoother animation, I guess. It 
was special, anyway :)
-- 
Regards,  Sander


Post a reply to this message

From: Dearmad
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 5 May 2001 17:34:48
Message: <3AF47380.745FD37B@qwest.net>
Sander wrote:
> 
> In article <3AF462E1.F7CF3B71@qwest.net>, Dearmad says...
> > Just testing to see if my ISP is functioning
> > properly... working on butterflies at the moment
> > so I thought I'd post...
> >
> I can't play it (W2k MediaPlayer 7.0 or Xing Player 3.30); It ran well
> in MainActor's VideoEditor... What did you use to animate and what type
> of image were they?

w2k won't run it?!  I just tested it out in WinME
and it's ok...

It was originally a MOV and then I changed it into
a BIK and then into and AVI and then used
AVI2MPG... hehehehe...  I'm messing around with
all the converter/coders I've got testing things
out.  What fun. :o)

> 
> There should be more images to make a smoother animation, I guess. It

How so?  You mean it didn't run smoothly?  That
was 24fps I thought... no 30fps... hm...  maybe
that's where the trouble is, I should do a 24 or
25.

> was special, anyway :)

thanks, de nada, I'm working on a swarm of them
during a ballet dance!  So nyah!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I'm serious. [wiping away sweat]

-peter

-- 
Obscure homebrewed graphics utilities and some
pictures:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad


Post a reply to this message

From: Vahur Krouverk
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 5 May 2001 17:49:05
Message: <3AF4755B.4DDBA4A2@comtrade.ee>
Dearmad wrote:
> 
> Sander wrote:
> > I can't play it (W2k MediaPlayer 7.0 or Xing Player 3.30); It ran well
> > in MainActor's VideoEditor... What did you use to animate and what type
> > of image were they?
> 
> w2k won't run it?!  I just tested it out in WinME
> and it's ok...

W2K and MediaPlayer 7.00.00.1956 here works OK.


Post a reply to this message

From: Data
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 5 May 2001 20:10:09
Message: <3af49661@news.povray.org>
"Dearmad" <dea### [at] qwestnet> wrote in message
news:3AF462E1.F7CF3B71@qwest.net...
> Just testing to see if my ISP is functioning
> properly... working on butterflies at the moment
> so I thought I'd post...

Hrm. You haven't thought of doing sprites, have you? <g> A few people I know
want butterflies in Creatures :)
> --
> Obscure homebrewed graphics utilities and some
> pictures:
> http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad


Post a reply to this message

From: Sander
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 6 May 2001 05:52:27
Message: <MPG.155f3d7483f2e04c989761@NEWS.POVRAY.ORG>
In article <3AF4755B.4DDBA4A2@comtrade.ee>, Vahur Krouverk says...
> 
> W2K and MediaPlayer 7.00.00.1956 here works OK.
> 
I have the same version of MP; the codecs I can find are:

DivX;-)MPEG-4 Video Codec (Fast-Motion)
DivX;-)MPEG-4 Video Codec (Low-Motion)
iccvid.dll

Intel Indeo(R)
Video Interactive 32-bit Driver
ir32_32.dll
msh261.drv
msh263.drv
msrle32.dll
msvidc32.dll

Should I get rid of some, or get some new ones?
Is it different from what you have?

I am at a loss why all this should be so difficult :(
-- 
Regards,  Sander


Post a reply to this message

From: Ib Rasmussen
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 6 May 2001 07:32:22
Message: <3AF5362D.1A62C170@ibras.dk>
Sander wrote:
> 
> In article <3AF4755B.4DDBA4A2@comtrade.ee>, Vahur Krouverk says...
> >
> > W2K and MediaPlayer 7.00.00.1956 here works OK.
> >
> I have the same version of MP; the codecs I can find are:
> 
> DivX;-)MPEG-4 Video Codec (Fast-Motion)
> DivX;-)MPEG-4 Video Codec (Low-Motion)
> iccvid.dll

> Intel Indeo(R)
> Video Interactive 32-bit Driver
> ir32_32.dll
> msh261.drv
> msh263.drv
> msrle32.dll
> msvidc32.dll

I viewed it without problems with MP 6.01.05.0217 under WinNT4.
The player says it uses Microsoft MPEG 1 Video Decoder Version 2, if
that's any help to you.

/Ib


Post a reply to this message

From: Vahur Krouverk
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 6 May 2001 08:15:48
Message: <3AF54080.C46DCE39@comtrade.ee>
Sander wrote:
> 
> In article <3AF4755B.4DDBA4A2@comtrade.ee>, Vahur Krouverk says...
> >
> > W2K and MediaPlayer 7.00.00.1956 here works OK.
> >
> I have the same version of MP; the codecs I can find are:
> 
> DivX;-)MPEG-4 Video Codec (Fast-Motion)
> DivX;-)MPEG-4 Video Codec (Low-Motion)

> Intel Indeo(R)
> msh261.drv
> msh263.drv
> msrle32.dll
> msvidc32.dll
I have these

> iccvid.dll
> Video Interactive 32-bit Driver
> ir32_32.dll
These I don't have

Additionally I have Cinepak Codec by Radius Inc. Don't know, from where
it came or for what it is.

> Should I get rid of some, or get some new ones?
Don't know, my experience with MS Media Player is ca. 2 weeks. What does
it say? Does it warn, that it does not have codec or just does not play
it or play, but does not show picture? Try to enable automatic codec
download, perhaps this helps.

Anyway, I try to avoid this MediaPlayer: requires too much memory
(16MB???), shows annoying 'Media Guide' crap , which does not interest
me ('Kidman after losing Cruise'!?!?!) and looks like ...

> Is it different from what you have?
See above.

> I am at a loss why all this should be so difficult :(
We come to this world naked, wet, hungry and crying, after this
everything gets just worse...


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 6 May 2001 09:52:20
Message: <3af55714$1@news.povray.org>
> Just testing to see if my ISP is functioning
> properly... working on butterflies at the moment
> so I thought I'd post...

looking good, would like it better if the bug got a little closer to the
camera :)


--
Rick

Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: Flutter dear butterfly... [test]
Date: 6 May 2001 12:03:52
Message: <3af575e8$1@news.povray.org>
"Sander" <san### [at] stolscom> wrote :
>
> I am at a loss why all this should be so difficult :(

    Do you regularly go to the Microsoft site for updates? If not, you may
not have all the available patches.


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.