POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Re: Glowing Space Explosion Server Time
5 Nov 2024 07:20:19 EST (-0500)
  Re: Glowing Space Explosion (Message 1 to 1 of 1)  
From: Ken
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 7 Sep 2000 16:51:46
Message: <39B7FF77.DC9EE85E@pacbell.net>
Rune wrote:

> And there's also some major bugs in the official version that has been fixed
> in MegaPOV...

<follow-ups to povray.general>

Major bugs such as what ?

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 7 Sep 2000 16:56:27
Message: <39b800fb@news.povray.org>
"Ken" wrote:
> Rune wrote:
> > And there's also some major bugs in the official
> > version that has been fixed in MegaPOV...
>
> <follow-ups to povray.general>
>
> Major bugs such as what ?

Such as the normal bugs.

Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated July 23)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 7 Sep 2000 17:01:46
Message: <39B801D1.A16D8FF@pacbell.net>
Rune wrote:

> > Major bugs such as what ?
> 
> Such as the normal bugs.

I never really accepted that those were bugs. I think of the
changes that Nathan made as design changes since they completely
broke backward compatibility with past versions of the program.

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 7 Sep 2000 18:07:36
Message: <39b811a8@news.povray.org>
Ken wrote:
> Major bugs such as what ?

Rune wrote:
> Such as the normal bugs.

Ken wrote:
> I never really accepted that those were bugs. I think of the
> changes that Nathan made as design changes since they completely
> broke backward compatibility with past versions of the program.

I consider it bugs indeed. I think I was one of the first to complain about
the strange way the normals worked. When scaling objects, the normals
changed. For example, in the scenes where I used Blob_Man I had to scale my
whole scene to fit Blob_Man rather than just scaling Blob_Man, because if I
scaled Blob_Man his skin and clothed looked all wrong. That's very annoying,
very unintuitive, and very inconsistent, and therefore I consider it a bug.
I don't think the broken backward compatibility makes it less a bug - on the
contrary. Since the bug affected practically all scenes using normals I
consider it a *major* bug. The bug was so big that the bug-fix had to brake
backward compatibility.

Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated July 23)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 7 Sep 2000 19:16:42
Message: <39B82171.9EE6DD0C@pacbell.net>
The feature worked exactly as it was designed therefore it was
not a bug. Just because a feature didn't work as YOU wanted it
to doesn't mean it was a bug.

-- 
Ken Tyler


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 8 Sep 2000 06:04:36
Message: <39b8b9b4@news.povray.org>
"Ken" wrote:
> The feature worked exactly as it was designed therefore it was
> not a bug. Just because a feature didn't work as YOU wanted it
> to doesn't mean it was a bug.

But the POV-Team says it is a bug.

I quote:

"========================
YES - These will be in POV 3.5
========================

Normal bug fix (and all related stuff)"

Can you show me a quote that proves the opposite?

Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated July 23)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 8 Sep 2000 06:42:39
Message: <39b8c29f@news.povray.org>
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
: I never really accepted that those were bugs. I think of the
: changes that Nathan made as design changes since they completely
: broke backward compatibility with past versions of the program.

  Usually bug fixes break backwards compatibility if the older scenes use
the buggy behaviour.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 8 Sep 2000 06:43:54
Message: <39b8c2e9@news.povray.org>
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
: The feature worked exactly as it was designed therefore it was
: not a bug.

  I somehow doubt that they designed "the normals should scale in the usual
way with these patterns but not with these other patterns".

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Jerry
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 8 Sep 2000 12:10:34
Message: <jerry-D740FD.09103408092000@news.povray.org>
In article <39b811a8@news.povray.org>, "Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> 
wrote:
>I consider it bugs indeed. I think I was one of the first to complain 
>about the strange way the normals worked. When scaling objects, the 
>normals changed. For example, in the scenes where I used Blob_Man I 
>had to scale my whole scene to fit Blob_Man rather than just scaling 
>Blob_Man, because if I scaled Blob_Man his skin and clothed looked all 
>wrong. That's very annoying, very unintuitive, and very inconsistent, 
>and therefore I consider it a bug.

The notion that normals should scale along with the objects they are 
applied to is very intuitive. If there is a 1-unit bump on a 4-unit 
plane, and the plane is doubled, the bump should now be 2 units. That 
wasn't the bug. The bug was that POV sometimes scaled the normal and 
sometimes didn't.

The bug-fix included (after some wrangling with Nathan, as I recall :*) 
the feature of turning normal scaling off, which I am sure is a useful 
feature for some. But that scaling included normals was not a bug; the 
bug was inconsistency in scaling with normals. (For a longer discussion 
of this, see the original postings on this server.)

Jerry


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: Glowing Space Explosion
Date: 8 Sep 2000 16:26:06
Message: <39b94b5e@news.povray.org>
"Jerry" wrote:
> The notion that normals should scale along with the objects
> they are applied to is very intuitive.

You may have misunderstood me; I agree with you.
I think it's wrong behaviour when the normal *isn't* scaled proportionally
with the object.
I believe it works correctly in MegaPOV, that is, the normals are scaled
proportionally with objects.

Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated July 23)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.