 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
> you are the funny one out of control on the floor, you're not too bright either,
>
> as the problems you will not resolve shall make evident
You don't like the way he's developing the software?
Well, take it or leave it then.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> how many people
> > just give up because of what is MS compiled? Now that I think more of it, you
> > guys are usin like MS 2007 whatever its called now?
>
> .... oh, and BTW - according to your report, it's the stuff compiled with Intel
> C++ that crapped up, while the MS-compiled stuff runs fine.
>
> See?
It was rhetorical, duh.
Let point out another little additional tidbit, instead of just answering a Q
with info, you have to get all egotisica with some moronic superiority complex.
Thinking you are superior to another only proves your inferiority.
No wonder there is not more going on here, you're all a bunch of jerks.
I wouldn't help you losers, ever.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Thinking you are superior to another only proves your inferiority.
>
> No wonder there is not more going on here, you're all a bunch of jerks.
>
> I wouldn't help you losers, ever.
No comment needed here...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> > Thinking you are superior to another only proves your inferiority.
> >
> > No wonder there is not more going on here, you're all a bunch of jerks.
> >
> > I wouldn't help you losers, ever.
>
> No comment needed here...
yah well, clearly the crap is infectious, I admit got carried away, and the
sentiment was poorly worded.
Not to imply your loserdom, you leave me with the feeling that loserdom cannot
be helped by me or anyone else. THe superior one keeps an open mind, meaning I
can be swayed with improvement or change coming from *them* seeing the light.
Even tho it has always gone "this way", it *can* go differently. The arrogant
moron without humility will say, because it has always gone this way, I *know*
it will always be this way. It has been called many things such as backward,
obtuse, or just plain stuck.
Anyway, you ppl are really sickening, so will leave you, to your angst and
intolerable bewilderment.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Go take your medicine, alpha.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Go take your medicine, alpha.
come on, let's stop this bullshit. We're all going too far right now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> one more thing. burnin bridges - real bright on your part.
Go away.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Roman" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> this is my first contribution here.
> I'm running the 64bit beta 29 on Windows Vista x64. Intel quadcore CPU, 4GB RAM.
>
> I'm trying to render a rather long sequence of images with radiosity with the
> built-in queue feature. The first scene renders problem-freely, but the
> subsequent ones in the queue fail with an "unknown internal error".
I've been experiencing the same error.
http://news.povray.org/povray.bugreports/thread/%3Cweb.493eda204f59c5434f5a8c2a0%40news.povray.org%3E/
However, I wasn't as thorough about trying to identify the causes. I didn't
think of trying to see what would happen if I disabled radiosity.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: beta 29: queue with radiosity crashes
Date: 28 Dec 2008 04:14:06
Message: <4957435e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:web.4956cf3a8625795875a42b1e0@news.povray.org...
> Let point out another little additional tidbit, instead of just answering
> a Q
> with info, you have to get all egotisica with some moronic superiority
> complex.
>
> Thinking you are superior to another only proves your inferiority.
>
> No wonder there is not more going on here, you're all a bunch of jerks.
>
> I wouldn't help you losers, ever.
come on Aq .... this was taking an exciting turn until the name calling. You
and I have collaborated on stuff in the past, and I've noticed your unique
communication style. I decided to work with you rather than against you.
You're a quarky fellow and so am I! Haven't you learned to play well with
others yet;-)
Cheers Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
alphaQuad <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Let point out another little additional tidbit, instead of just answering a Q
> with info, you have to get all egotisica with some moronic superiority complex.
> Thinking you are superior to another only proves your inferiority.
> No wonder there is not more going on here, you're all a bunch of jerks.
> I wouldn't help you losers, ever.
I don't think that kind of language is appropriate for this newsgroup
(nor the whole news server), so you should stop it.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
