Warp wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> That is another one of your totally unnecessary responses.
> 
>   Look who is talking.
> 
yip, it's me again.

Post a reply to this message

> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> That is another one of your totally unnecessary responses.
> 
>   Look who is talking.

You have an obvious and long-standing problem about diplomacy
(and nuance, distance,...).
Face it, and do something about it. Please.

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message

Fa3ien <fab### [at] yourshoesskynetbe> wrote:

> > andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> >> That is another one of your totally unnecessary responses.
> > 
> >   Look who is talking.

> You have an obvious and long-standing problem about diplomacy
> (and nuance, distance,...).
> Face it, and do something about it. Please.

  It's quite amusing how people make reproaching posts which themselves
are exactly what they reproach about.

  First someone blames me of posting totally unnecessary responses...
in a totally unnecessary post.

  Then someone else blames me of not being diplomatic... with a post
which can't be called very diplomatic either.

  Somehow the word "hypocrisy" comes to mind.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
>   Somehow the word "hypocrisy" comes to mind.

ROFL

Welcome to the club, Warp! There will always be a few people who do not
appreciate a direct response. Now that I don't post so often for exactly the
same reason, some people had to find someone else to hate - that seems to be
you, so congratulations :-P

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
> Fa3ien <fab### [at] yourshoesskynetbe> wrote:

>>> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>>> That is another one of your totally unnecessary responses.
>>>   Look who is talking.
> 
>> You have an obvious and long-standing problem about diplomacy
>> (and nuance, distance,...).
>> Face it, and do something about it. Please.
> 
>   It's quite amusing how people make reproaching posts which themselves
> are exactly what they reproach about.
> 
>   First someone blames me of posting totally unnecessary responses...
> in a totally unnecessary post.
> 
It wasn't unnecessary. It was meant to reassure a fairly new person here 
that it was not his fault that he got flamed from a direction that he 
was not expecting. I considered it very likely that after such a 
treatment this person was so scared that he would not come back. As you 
know one of the explicitly named sins in POVray news group is harassing 
  someone to the point that they leave. Hence my attempt to undue the 
harm that you might have inadvertently caused.
And it was indeed also to try and make you aware that what you wrote was 
based on very superficial reading. That you consider it unnecessary 
simply means to me that you still don't get it that in a polite 
discussion you first try to understand what the other person is saying 
before you reply.

Post a reply to this message

"Blackfeather" <jam### [at] blackfeathermediacom> wrote:
> Thanks in advance for recommending SMPOV, but I can't go without radiosity.

My noobiness shines through regardless.  Aparantly, even if I COULD get a
copy of the 3.7 beta 22, I still wouldn't be able to use radiosity.  Please
disregard this entire 'unecessary' thread, and don't frown upon my future
posts...

- James

(With regard to my project, I ended up just running 5 instances of 3.6.1c on
three computers.  Each image took over 27 hours, but came out just
beautiful.  Thanks for a great product!  I look foreward to the day I can
put all four cores to work.)

Post a reply to this message

"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message 
news:471302c1$1@news.povray.org...
> Warp wrote:
>>   Somehow the word "hypocrisy" comes to mind.
>
> ROFL
>
> Welcome to the club, Warp! There will always be a few people who 
> do not
> appreciate a direct response. Now that I don't post so often for 
> exactly the
> same reason, some people had to find someone else to hate - that 
> seems to be
> you, so congratulations :-P
>
> Thorsten

for what it is worth ...

Over the years I gace appreciated your "direct responses".
Something about objectiveness, not indulging in time
wasting and accuracy.

Illegitimi Non Carborundum
.

Post a reply to this message

"Blackfeather" <jam### [at] blackfeathermediacom> wrote in message 
news:web.4714d86dc43a5a194d6cf4fa0@news.povray.org...
> "Blackfeather" <jam### [at] blackfeathermediacom> wrote:
>> Thanks in advance for recommending SMPOV, but I can't go without 
>> radiosity.
>
> My noobiness shines through regardless.  Aparantly, even if I COULD get a
> copy of the 3.7 beta 22, I still wouldn't be able to use radiosity. 
> Please
> disregard this entire 'unecessary' thread, and don't frown upon my future
> posts...
>
> - James
>
> (With regard to my project, I ended up just running 5 instances of 3.6.1c 
> on
> three computers.  Each image took over 27 hours, but came out just
> beautiful.  Thanks for a great product!  I look foreward to the day I can
> put all four cores to work.)

Glad you managed a workaround. Sorry you walked in during a bit of a flame 
war and welcome :)

--Simon

Post a reply to this message

Blackfeather wrote:
> I know I'm going to get flamed or ignored for this, but what are the chances
> of me downloading the expired 3.7 beta 22?  I was hoping to do some
> multi-core rendering this weekend.  It kills me to see only 25% CPU usage
> for a 20 hour rendering!  Thanks in advance for recommending SMPOV, but I
> can't go without radiosity.
> 
> I apologize for asking, but I missed the expiry date by only a few days, and
> I absolutely promise not to post any bug reports...

I'll move them back to the old location and place a warning up.

-- Chris

Post a reply to this message

Chris Cason <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote:
> I'll move them back to the old location and place a warning up.

Thank you thank you thank you...


"Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> Glad you managed a workaround. Sorry you walked in during a bit of a flame
> war and welcome :)

thanks.  I don't mind so much.  I'm not new to forums, just new to this one.
 The flaming actually helps me see right off the bat who NOT to piss off.

- James

Post a reply to this message