POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.advanced-users : some benchmarks Server Time
25 Nov 2024 05:51:30 EST (-0500)
  some benchmarks (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: gk
Subject: some benchmarks
Date: 24 May 2003 02:39:14
Message: <3ecf1392@news.povray.org>
Time statistics(sec)
for benchmark.pov v1.02
on the same PC (P4/1.8G)
-w80 -h80 +a0.3 -v -d -f -x
  ---------------------------------------------------------
        |DOS +  |DOS      |FreeBSD |Linux   |Linux   |W2K  |
        |cwsdpmi|(W2K box)|4.7(gcc)|RH9(gcc)|RH9(icl)|(icl)|
-----------------------------------------------------------
Parse  |   13  |    11   |    3   |    7   |     3  |   3 |
Photon |   78  |    78   |   86   |   76   |    69  |  73 |
Trace  |  257  |   256   |  271   |  235   |   221  | 205 |
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total  |  348  |   345   |  360   |  318   |   293  | 281 |
  ---------------------------------------------------------


"It's nice to think that we have a choice"

Gleb


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: some benchmarks
Date: 24 May 2003 09:34:14
Message: <3ecf74d5@news.povray.org>
gk <g_k### [at] mail333com> wrote:
> -w80 -h80

  No patience for rendering the full-sized version? ;)

  IMHO the measurement would be more accurate if you rendered bigger
versions of the image.

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: gk
Subject: Re: some benchmarks
Date: 24 May 2003 15:36:52
Message: <3ecfc9d4@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:
>   No patience for rendering the full-sized version? ;)
> 
>   IMHO the measurement would be more accurate if you rendered bigger
> versions of the image.
> 
:) I have plenty, but our time is somehow limited,
so we have to share it with other interesting stuff.
Anyway I've got the answer for my question,
but it would be nice to know other results.


Post a reply to this message

From: ABX
Subject: Re: some benchmarks
Date: 26 May 2003 02:09:03
Message: <0mb3dvc5v7tc5j0vjlbj5eg7cenm5inas1@4ax.com>
On Sat, 24 May 2003 13:38:36 -0600, gk <g_k### [at] mail333com> wrote:
> DOS      
> (W2K box)

What's that ? DJGPPed compilation or Win32s command line. What about official
windows binaries measurement under the same installation of W2K?

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: gk
Subject: Re: some benchmarks
Date: 26 May 2003 09:53:06
Message: <3ed21c42@news.povray.org>
ABX wrote:
>>DOS      
>>(W2K box)
> What's that ? DJGPPed compilation or Win32s command line. What about official
> windows binaries measurement under the same installation of W2K?

It is DJGPP-compiled version
downloaded from your link, thank you for this btw.
In the first column it was tested under pure DOS,
in the second - under W2K in the FAR manager window.

Official Win32 showed actually the best results
for this test(see the last column in the table).
I have to admit, however, that some other scenes
have produced slightly better results under Linux.

Gleb


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.