 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Time statistics(sec)
for benchmark.pov v1.02
on the same PC (P4/1.8G)
-w80 -h80 +a0.3 -v -d -f -x
---------------------------------------------------------
|DOS + |DOS |FreeBSD |Linux |Linux |W2K |
|cwsdpmi|(W2K box)|4.7(gcc)|RH9(gcc)|RH9(icl)|(icl)|
-----------------------------------------------------------
Parse | 13 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 3 |
Photon | 78 | 78 | 86 | 76 | 69 | 73 |
Trace | 257 | 256 | 271 | 235 | 221 | 205 |
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total | 348 | 345 | 360 | 318 | 293 | 281 |
---------------------------------------------------------
"It's nice to think that we have a choice"
Gleb
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
gk <g_k### [at] mail333 com> wrote:
> -w80 -h80
No patience for rendering the full-sized version? ;)
IMHO the measurement would be more accurate if you rendered bigger
versions of the image.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> No patience for rendering the full-sized version? ;)
>
> IMHO the measurement would be more accurate if you rendered bigger
> versions of the image.
>
:) I have plenty, but our time is somehow limited,
so we have to share it with other interesting stuff.
Anyway I've got the answer for my question,
but it would be nice to know other results.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 24 May 2003 13:38:36 -0600, gk <g_k### [at] mail333com> wrote:
> DOS
> (W2K box)
What's that ? DJGPPed compilation or Win32s command line. What about official
windows binaries measurement under the same installation of W2K?
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ABX wrote:
>>DOS
>>(W2K box)
> What's that ? DJGPPed compilation or Win32s command line. What about official
> windows binaries measurement under the same installation of W2K?
It is DJGPP-compiled version
downloaded from your link, thank you for this btw.
In the first column it was tested under pure DOS,
in the second - under W2K in the FAR manager window.
Official Win32 showed actually the best results
for this test(see the last column in the table).
I have to admit, however, that some other scenes
have produced slightly better results under Linux.
Gleb
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
