Geoff Wedig wrote:

> Btw, what time zone do they use for determining the date of submission?  ;)
> I don't see it in the rules, but I could have easily missed it.

I'm pretty sure that I read that Pacific Standard Time is the time
zone used but don't quote me on it.

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:


> Geoff Wedig wrote:

>> Btw, what time zone do they use for determining the date of submission?  ;)
>> I don't see it in the rules, but I could have easily missed it.

> I'm pretty sure that I read that Pacific Standard Time is the time
> zone used but don't quote me on it.

Doesn't matter.  It's taking 1.5 hours/line at this point, with 100 lines to
go.  I'll have to either send an unfinished (almost done, complete render,
but before I tweaked some things) render or just not enter.  Darn.

Geoff

Post a reply to this message

Geoff Wedig wrote:
> 
> Btw, what time zone do they use for determining the date of submission?  ;)
> I don't see it in the rules, but I could have easily missed it.
> 
> Geoff

Pacific time. Besides, the real final deadline is when they stop it.
Often past midnight indeed. Once they start the script to generate
the web pages, etc, your stuck.

Post a reply to this message

or stop your current render if you don't 'need' the bottom lines and
submit that.

Geoff Wedig wrote:
> 
> Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> 
> > Geoff Wedig wrote:
> 
> >> Btw, what time zone do they use for determining the date of submission?  ;)
> >> I don't see it in the rules, but I could have easily missed it.
> 
> > I'm pretty sure that I read that Pacific Standard Time is the time
> > zone used but don't quote me on it.
> 
> Doesn't matter.  It's taking 1.5 hours/line at this point, with 100 lines to
> go.  I'll have to either send an unfinished (almost done, complete render,
> but before I tweaked some things) render or just not enter.  Darn.
> 
> Geoff

Post a reply to this message

Geoff Wedig wrote:
> 
> 
> Doesn't matter.  It's taking 1.5 hours/line at this point, with 100 lines to
> go.  I'll have to either send an unfinished (almost done, complete render,
> but before I tweaked some things) render or just not enter.  Darn.
> 
> Geoff

Play safe, submit the unperfect one (this has already been done in
the past). Not that you'll probably be able to send your final
image after the voting is closed. It won't be rated, but it'll
be there...

Post a reply to this message

Steve wrote: 

> Welcome aboard, and good luck in the IRTC.
> 
> Seems like a lot of new entrants this round, it'll be interesting
> and no doubt refreshing to see the work of so many newcomers.

Thank you!

I'm reading some of the groups for a while now - and because of 
so many inspiring work and ideas I decided to grab that good old
POV-Ray again to create a complete scene and participate in the
IRTC. Maybe this will help me to get a little bit more active and
creative in this area.

Claudius

Post a reply to this message

I counted 136 entries just now... many of which are newcomers.  This is
going to be
a very nice round.  I didn't think we'd see so many entries because of the
topic...
water is tough enough to do, plus similar rounds have been done in the past.
I
can't wait to see the images!

--
- Doug Eichenberg
  http://www.getinfo.net/douge
  dou### [at] nlsnet

Post a reply to this message

> I counted 136 entries just now...

I am 137

> water is tough enough to do, plus similar rounds have been done in the past.
> I
> can't wait to see the images!
>

yes, but underneath those tough-to-do, foaming rollers is a attractive
other-world of soft forms, soft textures, and diffuse light, well within the
range of beginners.  I also am eagerly awaiting the entries this round, I am
expecting the "bar" to be very high indeed.

Post a reply to this message

ryan constantine <rco### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> or stop your current render if you don't 'need' the bottom lines and
> submit that.

Unfortunately, most of the 'action', if you will, is at the bottom of the
image, so that wasn't an option.

I did manage to get it to finish by changing the image such that a few
partially transparent textures (water with foam) were totally opaque.  Not a
favored solution, but all I could do.

I'll probably start a new render over the weekend with the real textures,
just so I can find out how it comes out. ;)

Geoff

Post a reply to this message

Adrien Beau <adr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> Geoff Wedig wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Doesn't matter.  It's taking 1.5 hours/line at this point, with 100 lines to
>> go.  I'll have to either send an unfinished (almost done, complete render,
>> but before I tweaked some things) render or just not enter.  Darn.
>> 
>> Geoff

> Play safe, submit the unperfect one (this has already been done in
> the past). Not that you'll probably be able to send your final
> image after the voting is closed. It won't be rated, but it'll
> be there...

Well, that's more or less what I did, I just used imperfect #2 (one where I
took out a few complex thing to reduce render time to about 2 min / line)
rather than imperfect test render #1 (which is pretty good, but there's a
*major* flaw in it that had to go)

Geoff

Post a reply to this message