 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] panoramas de> wrote in message
> news:4631cc60@news.povray.org...
>>
>> Will there be more participants this time...?
>
> I certainly hope so. And even if yours is the only one, you won't be
> disappointing me. :o)
Right, let's talk about low expectations ;)
I had some trouble getting the data through to Steve by mail
(we resorted to trying a download after that failed), but it
should be up and available at TINA-CheP soon.
For the curious that aren't afraid of "MPEG compression
rash", it's currently stored at:
http://www.asamnet.de/~altendom/irtcstuff/maal_req.mpg
(9.5 MB)
For the size-doesnt-matter folk, there's also a larger and
cleaner version at
http://www.asamnet.de/~altendom/irtcstuff/maal_req.480x240.mp4
(23.8 MB)
Comments always welcome...
(and yes, i realize i'm the cinema4d-black-sheep in a POVray
newsgroup, thankyouverymuch ;)
-Markus
P.S.: Who in this newsgroup is really, really, honestly,
seriously going to build something for "The black robe"
animation topic?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 01 May 2007 16:24:32 +0200, Markus Altendorff
<maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote:
>
>Comments always welcome...
>(and yes, i realize i'm the cinema4d-black-sheep in a POVray
>newsgroup, thankyouverymuch ;)
I downloaded the big file. Impressive and sad.
>
>P.S.: Who in this newsgroup is really, really, honestly,
>seriously going to build something for "The black robe"
>animation topic?
Not me I'm afraid.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> P.S.: Who in this newsgroup is really, really, honestly,
> seriously going to build something for "The black robe"
> animation topic?
Markus --
I have started and will submit an animation for the new round.
Once again, sorry I let you down on the "Space Settlement....
Hey, I am acting like the old irtc>>>>One minute I am there, and
the next minute I am gone.......
"The Black Robe" -------->Wilkie Collins-------->Lewis Romanyne
Working on it
Darin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote in message
news:46374dca$1@news.povray.org...
> (and yes, i realize i'm the cinema4d-black-sheep in a POVray newsgroup,
> thankyouverymuch ;)
My friend, you are more than welcome around here.
> P.S.: Who in this newsgroup is really, really, honestly, seriously going
> to build something for "The black robe" animation topic?
Don't forget that it's an 'interpretation' of the title. "The Black
Robe" could be the name of a starfleet battle cruiser, a public house, a
euphemism for a disease, the name of a race horse, the name of a secret
sect, a wizards' special clothing, etc. What you do with it is down to you.
Personally, I really like it, and I'm thinking of entering the Animations*
as well as the Stills too.
*Animations will DEFINATELY be included on our new website, so get your
thinking cap on. It will be ready for approximately the middle of July to
upload your file, (>12MB cap). Look out for an update on this in the coming
months. :)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> *Animations will DEFINATELY be included on our new website, so get
your
> thinking cap on. It will be ready for approximately the middle of July to
> upload your file, (>12MB cap). Look out for an update on this in the
coming
> months. :)
>
> ~Steve~
I was unaware we were given an extra 2MB ---- It's Great ----
Thank you,
Darin (I find so much joy in the little things)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> *Animations will DEFINATELY be included on our new website, so get your
> thinking cap on. It will be ready for approximately the middle of July to
> upload your file, (>12MB cap). Look out for an update on this in the coming
> months. :)
Um, do you mean to say that animations must be a *minimum* of 12 megabytes?
Regards,
John
(who thinks that it was a typo.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> St. wrote:
>
>> *Animations will DEFINATELY be included on our new website, so get
>> your
>> thinking cap on. It will be ready for approximately the middle of July to
>> upload your file, (>12MB cap). Look out for an update on this in the
>> coming
>> months. :)
>
> Um, do you mean to say that animations must be a *minimum* of 12 megabytes?
Hey, that's easy to do! Just increase the bitrate of the
compressor :)
No, my guess would be it's the upload file size limit of the
web server's script engine, since it was mentioned earlier
the new website's going to be heavily automated. Not
necessarily connected to the file size limit as declared in
the IRTC rules.
I wouldn't complain about a 20% file size increase, either :)
-Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Markus Altendorff wrote:
> John VanSickle wrote:
>
>> St. wrote:
>>
>>> *Animations will DEFINATELY be included on our new website, so
>>> get your
>>> thinking cap on. It will be ready for approximately the middle of
>>> July to
>>> upload your file, (>12MB cap). Look out for an update on this in the
>>> coming
>>> months. :)
>>
>>
>> Um, do you mean to say that animations must be a *minimum* of 12
>> megabytes?
>
>
> Hey, that's easy to do! Just increase the bitrate of the compressor :)
>
> No, my guess would be it's the upload file size limit of the web
> server's script engine, since it was mentioned earlier the new website's
> going to be heavily automated. Not necessarily connected to the file
> size limit as declared in the IRTC rules.
>
> I wouldn't complain about a 20% file size increase, either :)
It probably wouldn't affect me, unless the 12M limit was a lower limit;
I've never had to cut to reduce the size of my .mpg files.
Regards,
JOhn
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:463bbd84@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> upload your file, (>12MB cap).
> Um, do you mean to say that animations must be a *minimum* of 12
> megabytes?
No, no, sorry, I meant an upper cap of 12 Mb's. Seeing as how the
Stills get an extra 100kb's, then I thought anims should get a little extra
too.
~Steve~
>
> Regards,
> John
> (who thinks that it was a typo.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote in message
news:463c5d72$1@news.povray.org...
> I wouldn't complain about a 20% file size increase, either :)
Well, that's what it is... A file size increase. :o)
~Steve~
>
> -Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
