 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There's always a moment where one can breathe easy, that occurs when a
backup copy of an acceptable draft is made. I just did it. Still lots of
improvements to go....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" <gregj;-)565### [at] aol com> wrote in message
news:3e99bf58$1@news.povray.org...
> There's always a moment where one can breathe easy, that occurs when a
> backup copy of an acceptable draft is made. I just did it. Still lots of
> improvements to go....
I'm not at that stage yet, and I don't think I'll have anything useable until
very near the deadline!
I've still got 2 scenes to create.
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek wrote:
>
I have 360 frames to render in the next 28 hours. This works out to
less than five minutes per remaining frame, for which I need 256 PPS
rendering speed.
The current shot is rendering at 107 PPS, and has 48 frames to go. I
may have to cut the final shot short.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> I have 360 frames to render in the next 28 hours. This works out to
> less than five minutes per remaining frame, for which I need 256 PPS
> rendering speed.
>
> The current shot is rendering at 107 PPS, and has 48 frames to go. I
> may have to cut the final shot short.
Hope i don't sound too stupid, but with me not being familiar
with povray terms, what *is* PPS? Sounds like "Pixel per Second"?
-- Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote in message
news:3e9b02b6@news.povray.org...
> Hope i don't sound too stupid, but with me not being familiar
> with povray terms, what *is* PPS? Sounds like "Pixel per Second"?
Correct. It's like frames per second only much much slower :)
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
>
> Tek wrote:
> >
>
> I have 360 frames to render in the next 28 hours. This works out to
> less than five minutes per remaining frame, for which I need 256 PPS
> rendering speed.
>
> The current shot is rendering at 107 PPS, and has 48 frames to go. I
> may have to cut the final shot short.
And to make things worse, the wife was not properly supervising the
two-year-old she was babysitting. The little tyke shut the computer
off (at the wall power switch). The wife didn't notice (and didn't
bother informing me) until eight hours later. I may be up in the
wee hours re-doing this.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Before I hit the big wall of 13MB, I realized that one of my scenes needed
to be re-rendered before I went to bed.
I started it on my 1.0 GHz PC, and saw that after dinner it wasn't
progressing sufficiently fast. So I uploaded the file to my 2.8 GHz PC
using my wireless cable modem, then rendered the second half of the frames,
then downloaded the BMP's back onto the other PC using the same. Ain't
technology great??
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3E9C4159.B5C20ABF@hotmail.com...
>
> The little tyke shut the computer
> off (at the wall power switch).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's technically off topic but this reminds me of once at work ....
I was called because of "some dire emergency" .....
a computer monitor wasn't working .... and all the clerical and secretarial
staff
was "totally stumped" trying to figure out what was wrong ....
so I figured out that maybe if they plugged the monitor "in" ......
true story
-Ed
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3E9C4159.B5C20ABF@hotmail.com...
> John VanSickle wrote:
>
> And to make things worse, the wife was not properly supervising the
> two-year-old she was babysitting. The little tyke shut the computer
> off (at the wall power switch). The wife didn't notice (and didn't
> bother informing me) until eight hours later. I may be up in the
> wee hours re-doing this.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
