|
 |
In article <40363a68@news.povray.org>, Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg>
wrote:
> Color myColor(.1, .2, .3);
>
> (Instead of "Color myColor = Color(.1, .2, .3);")
>
> No need for 'new', and there's no ambiguity.
I think you meant "redundancy"...this is something that really annoys me
about Java, and about C++ pointers. Though the syntax I favor is more
like:
def myColor: Color(0.1, 0.2, 0.3);
No more redundant typing, but it always starts with the same keyword, so
it's a little easier to read.
> > > There's a reason why in Java everything is not an instance of a class.
>
> > I think everything should have been.
>
> Really? Then good luck trying to write things like "a = b+c;" in Java...
That's not a problem with C++ objects, why should it be a problem with
Java objects? Or are you assuming that this "Objective-Java" would still
lack operator overloading?
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
