In article <4032b303$1@news.povray.org>,
Tom Melly <pov### [at] tomandlu couk> wrote:
> IMHO this comes down to 'pov ain't oo' - I don't think anyone denies
> that oo capabilities in pov wouldn't be at the very least interesting,
> but that's not the issue....
Wha...? You're saying you don't think OO capabilities would be useful,
or even interesting? And that you don't think anyone thinks it would be
interesting? It's sure spawned a lot of discussion for something so
utterly uninteresting...
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
