In article <4032b303$1@news.povray.org>,
Tom Melly <pov### [at] tomandlu couk> wrote:
> IMHO this comes down to 'pov ain't oo' - I don't think anyone denies
> that oo capabilities in pov wouldn't be at the very least interesting,
> but that's not the issue....
Now, what was that you were saying anyway? I never figured out if you
thought OO capabilities were interesting or not...though this thread
makes it clear that at least some people consider them to be of great
interest. It's almost at the 200 message mark...
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
